Octavian Marks LLC v. Marka Shipping LTD

Filing 30

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti denying 26 Ex Parte Application.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 OCTAVIAN MARKA, LLC, ) Case No. 13-2863 SC ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING EX PARTE ) APPLICATION v. ) ) MARKA SHIPPING LTD., in personam, ) and M/T MARKA, IMO NO. 9512484, in ) rem, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 18 Now before the Court is Plaintiff Octavian Marka, LLC's 19 ("Plaintiff") ex parte application for an order releasing the in 20 rem defendant vessel, the M/T Marka, from arrest and for dismissal 21 of this action without prejudice. 22 Plaintiff's counsel has filed a declaration of non-opposition on 23 behalf of one of the directors of Defendant Marka Shipping Ltd. 24 ("Defendant"), ECF No. 28, though it remains unclear if this 25 director has the authority to speak on behalf of Defendant. 26 Defendant has yet to make a formal appearance in this action. 27 Court held a hearing on the matter on August 5, 2013. 28 reasons set forth at the hearing, the Ex Parte Application is ECF No. 26 ("Ex Parte App."). For the The 1 DENIED without prejudice. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to re- 2 file an application. 3 should specify to whom the M/T Marka is being released. 4 also grants Plaintiff leave to file under seal the "confidential 5 settlement" referred to in the Ex Parte Application. 6 filings, the Court advises Plaintiff to follow the guidance set 7 forth by the Court at the hearing. Among other things, the amended application The Court For future 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Dated: August 5, 2013 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?