Ortega v. Wells Fargo & Company Short Term Disability Plan
Filing
24
ORDER granting as modified 23 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Responses due by 1/10/2014. Replies due by 1/17/2014. Motion Hearing set for 2/21/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/2/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2013)
Case3:13-cv-02866-JSW Document23 Filed11/18/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805)
MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMMONS (SBN: 226906)
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN
JAMES P. KEENLEY (SBN: 253106)
EMILY A. BOLT (SBN: 253109)
BOLT KEENLEY – ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1010 Grayson Street, Suite 2
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 225-0696
Facsimile: (510) 225-1095
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GARY ORTEGA
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
GARY ORTEGA
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHORT TERM
DISABILITY PLAN
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C13-2866-JSW
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
24
25
26
27
28
-1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Motion for Summary Judgment
Case3:13-cv-02866-JSW Document23 Filed11/18/13 Page2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, hereby stipulate as
follows and request the following relief from the Court:
(1) Plaintiff agrees to Defendants’ request to continue the hearing on its Motion for
Summary Judgment currently set for December 13, 2013 to January 31, 2014 or as
soon thereafter as the Court may hear it.
(2) Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion and Defendant’s reply shall be continued
accordingly as well.
(3) The parties anticipate that the case will be dismissed prior to the new hearing date and
are continuing this motion only in an abundance of caution.
Respectfully submitted,
12
13
Dated: November 18, 2013
14
GORDON & REES LLP
By:
15
16
/s/ Marcie Isom Fitzsimmons
Marcie Isom Fitzsimmons
Attorney for Defendant
17
18
19
Dated: November 18, 2013
BOLT KEENLEY – ATTORNEYS AT LAW
23
/s/ James P. Keenley
James P. Keenley
Attorney for Plaintiff
Pursuant to the parties stipulation, the Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing date to February
21, 2014. If the parties have not dismissed the case before then, Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed by
IT IS SO ORDERED. no later than January 10, 2014 and Defendant's opposition shall be filed by no
4
later than January 17, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
December
DATED: _________2, 2013
20
21
22
By:
____________________________
Hon. Jeffrey White
United States District Judge
25
26
27
1090129/17437830v.1
28
-2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Motion for Summary Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?