Vasquez v. Bank of America , N.A.
Filing
22
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 15 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Hearing on Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursurant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6), filed by Bank of America, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 10, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TINA M. VASQUEZ,
Case No. 13-cv-02902-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
9
10
BANK OF AMERICA , N.A., et al.,
Re: ECF No. 15
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 15. Pursuant to Federal Rule
14
of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have
15
thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral
16
argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for September 19, 2013, is hereby
17
VACATED.
18
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
19
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
20
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
21
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
22
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates
23
on which the parties are available for the hearing.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 10, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?