Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al

Filing 85

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Plaintiff may file a surreply brief of 10 pages or less within 7 days of the date of this order. The hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to November 1, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 7, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

10
11

James F. Hurst (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Maureen L. Rurka (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
James M. Hilmert (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
35 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
(312 558-5700
K. Joon Oh (SBN: 246142)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SANDOZ INC.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT

15

SANDOZ INC.,

16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
AMGEN INC. and HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE
INC.,

19
Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-CV-02904-MMC
_________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
SURREPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS ; CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY

NO. 3:13-CV-02904-MMC

1
2
3
4

Having considered Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to File a Surreply in Opposition to
and defendants' opposition thereto,
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court finds that good cause exists for Plaintiff to file a surreply
^
in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, of 10 pages or less.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff Sandoz Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File a

5

Surreply in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, is GRANTED, and Plaintiff may file a

6

surreply brief of 10 pages or less, within 7 days of the date of this order.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to
Dismiss is CONTINUED to November 1, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

8
9

DATED: ____________________
October 7, 2013
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

10
11

SF:361472.1

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY

NO. 3:13-CV-02904-MMC