Long v. Forty Niners Football Company LLC et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Extending Deadlines for Responsive Pleadings) filed by John York, Forty Niners Football Company LLC, Se t/Reset Deadlines as to 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Extending Deadlines for Responsive Pleadings). Responses due by 10/16/2013. Replies due by 10/23/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/7/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MATTHEW S. CONANT, State Bar No. 94920 msc@llcllp.com KARA A. ABELSON, State Bar No. 279320 kabelson@llcllp.com LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 Telephone: (510) 433-2600 Facsimile: (510) 433-2699 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY, LLC and JOHN YORK 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Su ite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612 -3541 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 11 DANIEL LONG, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 3:13-CV-02919-EMC Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC and JOHN YORK, Date: Time: Ctrm.: Defendants. 16 November 7, 2013 1:30 p.m. 5, 17th Floor 17 STIPULATION 18 19 Plaintiff Daniel Long and Defendants Forty Niners Football Company LLC and John 20 York, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for 21 responsive pleadings to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. Plaintiff’s deadline to file an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to October 16, 2013. 2. Defendants’ deadline to file a reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be extended to October 23, 2013. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, set for November 7, 2013, shall not be affected by the stipulated extensions. 28 1 Case No. 3:13-CV-02919-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 30705-41491 KAA 648500.1 1 Dated: October 1, 2013 2 By: 3 /s/ Geoffrey Becker GEOFFREY BECKER Attorneys for Plaintiff 4 5 Dated: October 1, 2013 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 6 By: 7 8 /s/ Kara A. Abelson KARA A. ABELSON Attorneys for Defendants 10 Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Su ite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612 -3541 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 3:13-CV-02919-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 30705-41491 KAA 648500.1 1 ORDER 2 WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested herein, the Court hereby makes the 3 foregoing Stipulation the Order of this Court. Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 4 must be filed on or before October 16, 2013. Defendants’ reply shall be filed on or before 5 October 23, 2013. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud ER 14 A H 13 R NIA APP FO 11 RT Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Su ite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612 -3541 10 ______________________________ ROVED NO LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Dated: ____________________ LI 10/7/13 9 UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:13-CV-02919-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 30705-41491 KAA 648500.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?