Long v. Forty Niners Football Company LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER to Show Cause (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DANIEL LONG,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-13-2919 EMC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL
COMPANY LLC, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
16
Before the Court is Defendants Forty Niners Football Company LLC’s and John York’s
17
motion to dismiss the first cause of action of Plaintiff Daniel Long’s first amended complaint for
18
breach of contract and Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. (Dkt. No. 16).
19
This Court has an obligation to assure itself that it has subject matter jurisdiction over this
20
action. See Csibi v. Fustos, 670 F.2d 134, 136 n.3 (9th Cir. 1982) (noting that lack of subject matter
21
jurisdiction can be raised sua sponte by a court at any time as it is “the duty of the federal courts to
22
assure themselves that their jurisdiction is not being exceeded”). Plaintiff alleges in his first
23
amended complaint that jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Dkt. No. 5, at 1). In order
24
for diversity jurisdiction to exist, there must be complete diversity between the parties. See 28
25
U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1); In re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litig., 549 F.3d 1223, 1234 (9th Cir. 2008).
26
Here, Plaintiff has alleged that he is a resident of California and “the Forty Niners Football
27
Company, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company and John York is a resident of the state of
28
Ohio.” (Dkt. No. 5, at 1).
1
Plaintiff has failed to adequately allege facts demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction.
2
For purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company is deemed to have the
3
citizenship of each of its members. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d
4
894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (“We therefore join our sister circuits and hold that, like a partnership, an
5
LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.”). Because Plaintiff’s first
6
amended complaint contains no allegations regarding the citizenship of each of Defendant Forty
7
Niners Football Company LLC’s members, this Court is unable to determine if there is complete
8
diversity between the parties and thus, whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute.
9
See, e.g., Wagner v. Spire Vision LLC, No. 13-00054 YGR, 2013 WL 941383, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar.
8, 2013) (remanding action to state court because “Defendants have failed to allege adequately the
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
citizenship of all the parties to this action. Limited liability companies, or LLCs, are like
12
partnerships in that they are a citizen of every state where its owners and members are citizens.”);
13
Nguyen v. BrooksAmerica, No. CV 09-7054-JFW, 2009 WL 3162435, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 29,
14
2009) (dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, in part, because “Plaintiffs have failed to
15
specifically allege . . . the citizenship of each member of the LLC defendant.”).
16
Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be
17
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, by 5:00 p.m., October 18, 2013,
18
Defendant Forty Niners Football Company LLC shall file a statement in which it lists each of its
19
members and the States of which they are citizens.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: October 16, 2013
24
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?