Heatherly et al v. The Brew et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 DAREN HEATHERLY and IRMA 12 RAMIREZ, 13 14 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE v. 15 THE BREW, and others, 16 Case No. 13-cv-02949 NC Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs filed this case alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act on 19 June 26, 2013. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants answered the complaint on August 26, 2013. Dkt. 20 No. 6. No other activity has occurred in the case since defendants answered. Therefore, on 21 June 16, 2014, the Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause by July 14, 2014, as to why their 22 case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Dkt. No. 9. To date, plaintiffs have 23 not responded to the order to show cause. Because all parties have consented to the 24 jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). 25 Accordingly, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 26 The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively terminate this matter. 27 28 Case No. 13-cv-02949 NC ORDER DISMISSING CASE 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Date: August 4, 2014 4 _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 13-cv-02949 NC ORDER DISMISSING CASE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?