Ramirez et al v. Lehr

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/6/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414) GEORGE S. KHOURY (State Bar #269738) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 4328 Redwood Hwy, Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: 415/674-8600 Facsimile: 415/674-9900 tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com Attorneys For Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN HEATHERLY , 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN HEATHERLY 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) BRIGITTE U. LEHR, an individual dba ) LEHR’S GERMAN SPECIALTIES; and ) BRIGITTE U. LEHR, Surviving Trustee of ) The BORIS LEHR and BRIGITTE U. ) LEHR REVOCABLE TRUST ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) CASE NO. CV-13-2950-EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 20 21 The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in 22 its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). Outside of the terms of the 23 Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its own 24 costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain 25 jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 26 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement 27 agreements). 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CV-13-2950-EMC 1 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through 2 their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with 3 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). 4 This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one 5 original document. 6 7 Dated: November 12, 2013 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 8 /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich Thomas E. Frankovich Attorneys for IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN HEATHERLY 9 By: 10 11 12 Dated: November 12, 2013 RAGUNATH K. DINDIAL, Attorney at Law 13 14 By: /s/ Ragunath K. Dindial Ragunath K. Dindial Attorney for Defendants BRIGITTE U. LEHR, an individual dba LEHR’S GERMAN SPECIALTIES; and BRIGITTE U. LEHR, Surviving Trustee of The BORIS LEHR and BRIGITTE U. LEHR REVOCABLE TRUST 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER 20 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 22 Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the enforcement be necessary a Honorable Magistrate Edward M. Chendw Judge E UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE RT 28 hen rd M. C NO 27 ER H STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON LI 26 1/6/14 Dated: _____________, 2013 D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO A 25 R NIA 24 FO UNIT ED S RT U O S DISTRICT TE C 23 purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release A T should such N CASE NO. CV-13-2950-EMC F D IS T IC T O -2R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?