Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 100

NOTICE OF REFERENCE; ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES; AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL 94 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/03/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
SYNOSYS, INC.,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

ATOPTECH, INC.,

15

No. C-13-02965-MMC (DMR)
NOTICE OF REFERENCE; ORDER
RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES; AND
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL [DOCKET NO.
94] WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17
18
19

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for resolution of

20

Plaintiff’s motion to compel, Docket No. 94, and all further discovery matters. See Docket No. 97.

21

The motion to compel is denied without prejudice. The parties are ordered to comply with the

22

procedure ordered by Judge Chesney (Docket No. 97) and to file a joint letter, if any, by no later

23

than April 18, 2014.

24

For any future discovery disputes, the parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in

25

this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Northern District of California’s Local

26

Rules, General Orders, and Standing Orders. Local rules, general orders, standing orders, and

27

instructions for using the Court's Electronic Case Filing system are available at

28

1

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply with any of the rules or orders may be a ground

2

for sanctions.

3
4

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES
In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,

5

the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. Instead,

6

as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to resolve their

7

disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and may not be

8

conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint letter no

9

later than five business days after the meet and confer session, unless otherwise directed by the
court. Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

that the parties met and conferred in person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the

12

letter. Going issue-by-issue, the joint letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each

13

party’s position with appropriate legal authority; and provide each party’s final proposed

14

compromise before moving to the next issue. The joint letter shall not exceed ten pages without

15

leave of court. Parties are expected to plan for and cooperate in preparing the joint letter so

16

that each side has adequate time to address the arguments. In the rare instance that a joint letter

17

is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four pages, which shall include an

18

explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. The parties shall submit one exhibit to the letter

19

that only sets forth each disputed discovery request in full, followed immediately by the objections

20

and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in any such exhibit. No other

21

exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the court. The court will review the

22

submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary. Discovery

23

letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings >

24

Motions - General > "Discovery Letter Brief".

25

In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the court has found that it is often efficient

26

and beneficial for counsel to appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where appropriate, to

27

engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining available to rule on

28

any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the court expects counsel to appear

2

1

in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the court's discretion,

2

upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that

3

good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order

4

to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the

5

request.

6

In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after

7

exhausting good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil

8

L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the

9

discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.
CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) and 5-2(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of certain

12

filings and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and

13

submit it to the Oakland Clerk’s Office.

14

Any stipulation or proposed order submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted by email

15

to [e-mail] as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is e-

16

filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the

17

court.

18

PRIVILEGE LOGS

19

If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that it

20

is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide a

21

privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a

22

document’s designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall

23

set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of

24

similarly situated documents:

25

(a) the title and description of the document, including number of pages or

26

Bates-number range;

27

(b) the subject matter addressed in the document;

28

(c) the identity and position of its author(s);

3

1

(d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients;

2

(e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was

3

sent to or shared with persons other than its author(s); and

4

(f) the specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

5

Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint need not be

6

placed on a privilege log. Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of

7

the privilege or protection.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Dated: April 3, 2014

12

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4