Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 170

ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Arnold & Porter LLP is substituted in place of Dickstein Shapiro LLP as counsel for Defendant. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 8, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)

Download PDF
Paul Alexander (#49997) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 1801 Page Mill Road Suite 110 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216 Telephone: (650) 798-2920 Fax: (650) 798-2999 E-Mail: Paul.Alexander@aporter.com Martin R. Glick (#40187) Emily C. Hostage (#287116) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 7th Floor Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Telephone: (415) 471-3100 Fax: (415) 471-3400 E-Mail: Marty.Glick@aporter.com E-Mail: Emily.Hostage@aporter.com Denise McKenzie (#193313) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Forty-Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 Fax: (213) 243-4199 E-Mail: Denise.McKenzie@aporter.com Attorneys for Defendant ATOPTECH, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SYNOPSYS, INC., Case No.: 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Plaintiff, SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VS. ATOPTECH, INC., Defendant. Defendant ATOPTECH, INC., hereby substitutes Arnold & Porter LLP as counsel of record in the above-referenced action in place of Dickstein Shapiro LLP SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:13-cv-02965-MMC I consent to the above substitution of attorneys. 2014 Dated: September ATOPTECH, INC. By: Claudia Chen —19:i;eeter of Finance P I accept this substitution. Dated: September 5, 2014 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP By: Deborah E. Fishman I accept this substitution. Dated: September , 2014 .) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: Paul Alexander IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 34860154v2 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:13-cv-02965-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?