Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 226

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION re: LETTER 193 . By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys' definition of "Accused Instrumentalities" as used in Synopsys' discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/10/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SYNOSYS, INC., 12 13 Plaintiff(s), v. 14 ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER [DOCKET NO. 193] ATOPTECH, INC., 15 No. C-13-02965 DMR Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 Before the court is a joint discovery letter filed by the parties. [Docket No. 193.] In the 18 letter, Synopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to Synopsys’ discovery requests, some of 19 which reference “Accused Instrumentalities.” This term is not defined in the joint discovery letter. 20 By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the 21 court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys’ definition of “Accused 22 Instrumentalities” as used in Synopsys’ discovery requests. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: February 10, 2015 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?