Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 226

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION re: LETTER 193 . By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys' definition of "Accused Instrumentalities" as used in Synopsys' discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/10/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
SYNOSYS, INC.,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBMISSION RE: JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER [DOCKET NO. 193]

ATOPTECH, INC.,

15

No. C-13-02965 DMR

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

Before the court is a joint discovery letter filed by the parties. [Docket No. 193.] In the

18

letter, Synopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to Synopsys’ discovery requests, some of

19

which reference “Accused Instrumentalities.” This term is not defined in the joint discovery letter.

20

By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the

21

court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys’ definition of “Accused

22

Instrumentalities” as used in Synopsys’ discovery requests.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: February 10, 2015

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge