Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
226
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION re: LETTER 193 . By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys' definition of "Accused Instrumentalities" as used in Synopsys' discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/10/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SYNOSYS, INC.,
12
13
Plaintiff(s),
v.
14
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBMISSION RE: JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER [DOCKET NO. 193]
ATOPTECH, INC.,
15
No. C-13-02965 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
Before the court is a joint discovery letter filed by the parties. [Docket No. 193.] In the
18
letter, Synopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to Synopsys’ discovery requests, some of
19
which reference “Accused Instrumentalities.” This term is not defined in the joint discovery letter.
20
By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the
21
court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys’ definition of “Accused
22
Instrumentalities” as used in Synopsys’ discovery requests.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: February 10, 2015
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?