Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 270

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 16, 2015 ORDER The motion is denied, without prejudice to Synopsys' submitting to Magistrate Judge Ryu a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, see Civil L.R. 7-9(b), or any other appropriate filing seeking reconsideration of the subject order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 1, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.
/

12
13

15
16
17
18
19
20

Before the Court is plaintiff Synopsys, Inc’s (“Synopsys”) “Motion for Relief from
Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge,” filed March 30, 2015, by which
Synopsys seeks reversal of Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu’s order of March 16, 2015, to
the extent such order denies Synopsys’ motion to compel production of defendant
ATopTech Inc.’s (“ATopTech”) source code. The motion is based on evidence not
available for submission to Magistrate Judge Ryu prior to the order Synopsys now
challenges and thus is, in essence, a motion for reconsideration based on newly obtained
evidence.

21
22
23
24
25

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MARCH 16, 2015 ORDER

v.

11

14

No. C 13-2965 MMC

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to Synopsys’
submitting to Magistrate Judge Ryu a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration,
see Civil L.R. 7-9(b), or any other appropriate filing seeking reconsideration of the subject
order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: April 1, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge