Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 270

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 16, 2015 ORDER The motion is denied, without prejudice to Synopsys' submitting to Magistrate Judge Ryu a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, see Civil L.R. 7-9(b), or any other appropriate filing seeking reconsideration of the subject order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 1, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, ATOPTECH, INC., Defendant. / 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is plaintiff Synopsys, Inc’s (“Synopsys”) “Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge,” filed March 30, 2015, by which Synopsys seeks reversal of Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu’s order of March 16, 2015, to the extent such order denies Synopsys’ motion to compel production of defendant ATopTech Inc.’s (“ATopTech”) source code. The motion is based on evidence not available for submission to Magistrate Judge Ryu prior to the order Synopsys now challenges and thus is, in essence, a motion for reconsideration based on newly obtained evidence. 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MARCH 16, 2015 ORDER v. 11 14 No. C 13-2965 MMC SYNOPSYS, INC., Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to Synopsys’ submitting to Magistrate Judge Ryu a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, see Civil L.R. 7-9(b), or any other appropriate filing seeking reconsideration of the subject order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: April 1, 2015 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?