Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 282

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/15/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

SY
YNOPSYS, INC.,

Case No. 1
13-cv-02965
5-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER F
FOR SUPPL
LEMENTAL
L
LETTER

9
10

ATOPTECH, INC,
A

No.
Re: Dkt. N 272

.
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On Apr 2, 2015, Plaintiff Synopsys Inc. fi
ril
P
iled a motion for leave to file a moti for
n
o
ion

14

rec
consideration [Docket No. 272.] In that motion Synopsys seeks an ord requiring Defendant
n.
N
n
n,
der
g

15

AT
TopTech to produce the source code for ATopTe
p
s
ech’s Aprisa or Apogee p
a
products.

16

On Apr 9, 2015, th Honorabl Maxine M Chesney issued an ord lifting the stay on
ril
he
le
M.
der

17

Syn
nopsys’s cla
aims based on certain pat
tents; grantin Synopsys motion to bifurcate its copyright
ng
s’
s

18

and breach clai from its patent claim and defer
d
ims
ms;
rring ruling on Synopsys motion to bifurcate
s’s
o

19

its copyright an breach cla
nd
aims from ATopTech’s antitrust cou
A
unterclaims. [Docket No 280.]
o.

20

By Apr 20, 2015, Synopsys sh file a let of no mo than one page stating whether it
ril
hall
tter
ore
e
g

21

inte
ends to seek the source code for ATopTech’s Ap
k
c
prisa or Apo
ogee product at this time on the
ts

22

bas of Judge Chesney’s April 9 Order. If so, Syn
sis
A
nopsys shall also indicate whether it has
e

23

com
mmunicated to ATopTec and wheth the parti have met and conferr about the issue.
ch
her
ies
t
red
e

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 15 2015
5,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
Donna M. Ryu
Un
nited States M
Magistrate J
Judge