Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
294
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO STRIKE ALLEGATIONS AND DEFENSES For the reasons stated on the record, Counts I through VII are dismissed, the Ninth and Eleventh Affirmative Defenses are stricken, and the challenged portio ns of paragraphs 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 28 of the answer are stricken. ATopTech is afforded leave to amend to cure the deficiencies noted, any such amended pleading to be filed no later than June 1, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 13-2965 MMC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO
STRIKE ALLEGATIONS AND
DEFENSES
v.
ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Before the Court is plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s (“Synopsys”) Motion to Dismiss
18
Defendant AtopTech’s Amended Counterclaims and to Strike Allegations and Affirmative
19
Defenses, filed March 30, 2015, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules
20
of Civil Procedure. Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) has filed opposition, to which
21
Synopsys has replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on May 8, 2015. David C.
22
Kiernan, Patrick T. Michael, and Amir Q. Amiri of Jones Day appeared on behalf of
23
Synopsys. Daniel B. Asimow, Paul Alexander, and Daniel Pastor of Arnold & Porter LLP
24
appeared on behalf of ATopTech. Having considered the parties’ respective written
25
submissions and the arguments of counsel, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record,
26
hereby GRANTS the motion.
27
28
Accordingly, Counts I through VII are hereby DISMISSED, the Ninth and Eleventh
Affirmative Defenses are hereby STRICKEN, and the challenged portions of paragraphs 2,
1
6, 9, 12, 15, and 28 of the Answer are hereby STRICKEN. ATopTech is hereby afforded
2
leave to amend to cure the deficiencies noted, any such amended pleading to be filed no
3
later than June 1, 2015.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: May 8, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?