Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
34
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 25 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
v.
13
ATOPTECH, INC.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
) Case No. 13-02965-SC
)
) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
) MOTION TO SEAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Plaintiff") brings this action for,
19
inter alia, copyright infringement, patent infringement, and
20
misappropriation of trade secrets against Defendant ATopTech, Inc.
21
("Defendant").
22
10-2, 10-3, which were filed by Defendant in connection with its
23
pending motion to dismiss.
24
are the subject of Plaintiff's trade secret misappropriation
25
claims.
26
documents in question are not trade secrets.
27
The Court declines to reach the merits of Plaintiff's trade secret
28
claim on a motion to seal.
Plaintiff now moves to seal two documents, ECF Nos.
ECF No. 25 ("Mot.").
Both documents
Defendant has opposed the motion on the ground that the
ECF No. 29 ("Opp'n").
Out of an abundance of caution, the
1
Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to seal and ORDERS the clerk of the
2
court to file under seal the following documents: ECF Nos. 10-2,
3
10-3.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: August 26, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?