Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 356

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. The Court hereby grants the Administrative Motion. ATopTech shall file its Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims by September 18, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 27, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SYNOPSYS, INC., No. CV-13-2965 MMC For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 11 v. 12 ATOPTECH, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 / Before the Court is defendant ATopTech’s Administrative Motion for an Extension, by which defendant seeks an order allowing it to defer the filing of its Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims until after the Court has ruled on plaintiff Synopsys’s pending Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. On August 27, 2015, plaintiff timely filed its opposition to defendant’s Administrative Motion. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the instant motion, the Court, in the interest of judicial economy, finds it preferable to grant the relief requested, to avoid the potential need for the filing and review of a Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Accordingly, AtopTech’s Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED. ATopTech shall file its Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims by September 18, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: August 27, 2015 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?