Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 360

ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AT THE COURTHOUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/04/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

SY
YNOPSYS, INC.,

Case No. 1
13-cv-02965
5-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER T MEET A
TO
AND CONF
FER AT
THE COU
URTHOUSE
E

9
10

ATOPTECH, INC,
A

Re: Dkt. N 327, 328 331
Nos.
8,

.
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

The par
rties have fil several jo discover letters tha collectivel raise appr
led
oint
ry
at
ly
roximately

14

30 discovery disputes relev to Synopsys’s non-p
vant
patent claim against AT
ms
TopTech. Se Docket
ee

15

No 327, 328, 331. It is cl that the parties did n finish me
os.
lear
not
eeting and conferring ab
bout some of
f

16

the disputes before filing the letters. For exampl in Docket No. 327, Synopsys stat that it
ese
b
g
le,
t
tes

17

“m
moves to com the depo
mpel
osition of AT
TopTech, Inc pursuant t Rule 30(b
c.
to
b)(6) on Topi
ics…15(a)-

18

(d),” yet provid no argum regardin this aspec of its moti to compel.
des
ment
ng
ct
ion

19

Accord
dingly, the pa
arties shall meet and con on September 10, 2
m
nfer
2015 at 10:0 a.m. in
00

20

the Attorney Lounge on the fourth floo of the cour
e
e
or
urthouse, prio to the hea
or
aring on the l
letters, and

21

sho
ould be prepared to stay after the hea
aring for the remainder o the afterno to meet and confer.
of
oon

22

In addition, the parties are notified that the court’s motion cale
e
t
endar on Sep
ptember 10 is long; the
s

23

par
rties will onl be permitt to make limited argu
ly
ted
ument, and sh
hould be pre
epared to pre
esent only its
s

24

bes and most important po
st
i
oints.

25

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.

26
27
28

Da
ated: Septem
mber 4, 2015
___
__________
___________
__________
________
Donna M. Ryu
Un
nited States M
Magistrate J
Judge