Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 636

FURTHER PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 29, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)
[e-mail]
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
[e-mail]
Krista S. Schwartz (State Bar No. 303604)
[e-mail]
Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Heather N. Fugitt (SBN 261588)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

15
16

Paul Alexander (#49997)
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Martin R. Glick (#40187)
Daniel Asimow (#165661)
Willow White Noonan (#277584)
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center. 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Denise McKenzie (#193313)
Ryan Nishimoto (#235208)
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff,
v.
ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)
FURTHER PRETRIAL STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:

February 29, 2016
9:00 A.M.
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
7, 19th Floor

27
28
PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”)
(together, “the Parties”), by and through the undersigned counsel, submit this Stipulation and
Proposed Order Regarding Admission of Identified Exhibits.
WHEREAS the Parties agree to the admissibility of a number of trial exhibits; and
WHEREAS the Parties agree that admission of evidence should be streamlined;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties as
follows:
The Parties agree that the following exhibits are admissible and may be entered into
evidence without any requirement of laying a foundation:

10
11

From Synopsys’ Trial Exhibit List
Description
Beginning Bates
SYNPS00002287

SYNPS00002702

15

Trial
Exhibit
No.
6
Deposit Materials for PrimeTime
2006.12., Registration No. TX 7261-049 - PrimeTime User Guide:
Advanced Timing Analysis, Version
Z-2006.12, December 2006
18
PrimeTime 2006.12 E628

SNPS_EXE_011

SNPS_EXE_011

16

26

SYNPS00005353

SYNPS00006699

SYNPS00006700

SYNPS00007077

SYNPS00009863

SYNPS00010232

SYNPS00001340

SYNPS00001913

ATopTech
0012827

ATopTech
0013090

ATopTech
0025075

ATopTech
0026757

12
13
14

17
18

27

19
20
21

36

22
23

79

24
25

235

26
27

252

Deposit Materials for PrimeTime
2010.06., Registration No. TX 7260-556 - PrimeTime Commands,
Version 2010.06, June 2010
Deposit Materials for PrimeTime
2010.06., Registration No. TX 7260-556 - PrimeTime Advanced
Timing Analysis User Guide,
Version D-2010.06, June 2010
Deposit Materials for PrimeTime
2010.06., Registration No. TX 7260-556 - PrimeTime Variables,
Version D-2010.06, June 2010
Deposit Materials for Synopsys
GoldTime 2011.12., Registration
No. TX 7-670-937 - Synopsys
GoldTime Documentation: User
Guide 2011.12-patch Edition
Aprisa/ Apogee Parameter Guide,
Release 09.10. rel. 1, November 25,
2009
Aprisa Apogee Reference Manual
09.10.rel.1, November 25, 2009

Ending Bates

28
1

PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Trial
Description
Exhibit
No.
289
PrimeTime Commands Version G2012.06, June 2012
290
PrimeTime Variables Version G2012.06, June 2012
296
PrimeTime Quick Reference
Version 2004.06, June 2004
398
Chen Ex. 04 - Revenue by Quarter

7

419

12

542

13

675

14

676

15

677

16

1439

Chern Ex. 25 - 8/5/2014
Aprisa/Apogee Parameter Guide,
Release 13.11.rel.4.0
Thune Ex. 07 - Compilation of
ATopTech Balance Sheets,
Statement of Operations, and Cash
Flow Statements
Thune Ex. 08 - 12/31/2009
Composite exhibit of quarterly
financial statements
Tregillis Ex. 03 - Table - Revenues
by Customer
Tier 2 Profit Contribution - Q1'08 to
Q4'08
IG Tier 2 Product Profit Margins 2009-Q1 - 2011-Q4
IG Tier 2 Product Profit Margins 2012-Q1 - 2015-Q1
1006 summary

8

5181

1440

1443

21

1444

22

14453

DG Quarterly Profit Report - Q215
and Q116
DG Q315 and Q415 Quarterly Profit
Report
ATopTech’s Financials - Income
Statement
ATopTech’s Financials - Balance
Sheet

ATopTech
0138922
ATopTech
0140360
ATopTech
0245246
ATopTech
0059570
ATopTech
0018305

ATopTech
0140359
ATopTech
0140693
ATopTech
0245369
ATopTech
0059570
ATopTech
0018852

ATopTech
0285136

ATopTech
0285153

ATopTech
1966708

ATopTech
1966713

SYNPS02282670
SYNPS01372583
SYNPS01372585
SYNPS01372586

SYNPS02282670
SYNPS01372583
SYNPS01372585
SYNPS01372586

SYNPS02393352
SYNPS02393353
ATopTech
1982959
ATopTech
1982960

SYNPS02393352
SYNPS02393353
ATopTech
1982959
ATopTech
1982960

1006 summary

20

Ending Bates

1006 summary

1441

Beginning Bates

9
10

5192

11

17
18
19

23

14464

24
25
26
27
28

1

Subject to confidentiality agreement and order
2
Subject to confidentiality agreement and order
3
Subject to confidentiality agreement and order
4

Subject to confidentiality agreement and order
-2-

PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)

1
2
3
4

Trial
Description
Exhibit
No.
14475
ATopTech’s Financials - Cash Flow
14576

Beginning Bates
ATopTech
1982961
ATopTech
1982976

ATopTech 2015 Financial
Spreadsheet

Ending Bates
ATopTech
1982961
ATopTech
1982976

5
6
7
8

Trial
Exhibit
No.
1922

From ATopTech’s Trial Exhibit List
Bates Range/Document Identifier
DESCRIPTION
ATopTech, Inc. Revenue by
customer - Updated

9
10

Dated: February 29, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

11

JONES DAY

12

By:

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

14
15
16

/s/ Patrick T. Michael
Patrick T. Michael

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

17
18

Dated: February 29, 2016

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

19
By:

20

/s/ Paul Alexander
Paul Alexander

21
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.

22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ___________________
February 29, 2016

________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

26
27

5

Subject to confidentiality agreement and order

28

6

Subject to confidentiality agreement and order
-3-

PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADMISSION OF IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)