Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
72
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET DEADLINE FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO SET DEADLINE FOR
PATENT INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS
v.
12
13
No. C 13-2965 MMC
ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.
14
/
15
Before the Court is defendant’s Administrative Motion to Set Deadline for Patent
16
17
Infringement Contentions, filed December 10, 2013, by which defendant requests the Court
18
order plaintiff to serve its patent infringement contentions by January 24, 2014, rather than
19
by a date no later than fourteen days after the Initial Case Management Conference, as
20
provided by the Patent Local Rules. See Patent L.R. 3–1. On December 16, 2013, plaintiff
21
filed its opposition to defendant’s motion.
22
The Court, having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions,
23
finds it appropriate to first resolve the parties’ pending motions to disqualify counsel and to
24
dismiss, and thereafter, at the Initial Case Management Conference, to set all dates
25
relevant to claim construction.
26
//
27
28
1
Accordingly, defendant’s Administrative Motion is hereby DENIED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: January 10, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?