Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 72

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET DEADLINE FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SYNOPSYS, INC., 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET DEADLINE FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS v. 12 13 No. C 13-2965 MMC ATOPTECH, INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 Before the Court is defendant’s Administrative Motion to Set Deadline for Patent 16 17 Infringement Contentions, filed December 10, 2013, by which defendant requests the Court 18 order plaintiff to serve its patent infringement contentions by January 24, 2014, rather than 19 by a date no later than fourteen days after the Initial Case Management Conference, as 20 provided by the Patent Local Rules. See Patent L.R. 3–1. On December 16, 2013, plaintiff 21 filed its opposition to defendant’s motion. 22 The Court, having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, 23 finds it appropriate to first resolve the parties’ pending motions to disqualify counsel and to 24 dismiss, and thereafter, at the Initial Case Management Conference, to set all dates 25 relevant to claim construction. 26 // 27 28 1 Accordingly, defendant’s Administrative Motion is hereby DENIED. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: January 10, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?