Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 755

ORDER Requesting Response from Synopsys, Inc. re 744 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.'s Bench Trial Motion in Limine No. 1 and Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/07/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE
FROM SYNOPSYS

9
10

ATOPTECH, INC,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 744, 753

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On May 24, 2016, the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney referred Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s

13

Bench Trial Motion in Limine No. 1 and Motion for Protective Order [Docket No. 744] regarding

14

the deposition of Mr. Alpesh Kothari to the undersigned. [Docket No. 749.]

15

On June 6, 2016, ATopTech, Inc. filed a response stating that ATopTech will withdraw the

16

notice of Kothari’s deposition and will not seek to call him as a witness at the July 25, 2016 Bench

17

Trial. [Docket No. 753 at 2, 5.] In light of ATopTech’s response to Synopsys’s Bench Trial

18

Motion in Limine No. 1 and Motion for Protective Order, it appears that the two motions are

19

moot. By June 10, 2016, Synopsys shall either withdraw its motions, or shall submit a one

20

paragraph letter explaining why the motions are not moot and why the June 30, 2016 hearing

21

should go forward.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 7, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge