Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 756

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 8, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359) ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745) pmichael@jonesday.com Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604) ksschwartz@jonesday.com Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356) jcliu@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Heather N. Fugitt (SBN 261588) hfugitt@jonesday.com JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739-3939 Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 Paul Alexander (SBN49997) Martin R. Glick (SBN 40187) Sean Callagy (SBN 255230) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center. 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Telephone: (415) 471-3100 Fax: (415) 471-3400 paul.alexander@aporter.com marty.glick@aporter.com sean.callagy@aporter.com Denise McKenzie (SBN 193313) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 Fax: (213) 243-4199 E-Mail: Denise.McKenzie@aporter.com Attorneys for Defendant ATOPTECH, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 SYNOPSYS, INC., 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL ATOPTECH, INC., Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR) 1 2 3 4 5 Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) (together, “the Parties”), by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pre-Trial Deadlines: Deadline Party Task ATopTech Serve witness list, including identification on whether the witnesses will be called live or by deposition testimony and brief narrative descriptions of the witnesses’ expected testimony. Serve list of exhibits expected to be used. Synopsys Serve witness list, including identification on whether the witnesses will be called live or by deposition testimony and brief narrative descriptions of the witnesses’ expected testimony. Serve list of exhibits expected to be used. Serve objections, if any, to exhibits and/or testimony of witnesses listed by ATopTech. ATopTech Serve list of any supplemental witnesses, including identification on whether the witnesses will be called live or by deposition testimony and brief narrative descriptions of the witnesses’ expected testimony, and supplemental exhibits expected to be used in view of Synopsys’ list of witnesses and exhibits. Serve objections, if any, to exhibits and/or testimony of witnesses listed by Synopsys. Serve deposition excerpts expected to be used. 7/1/2016 Synopsys Serve list of any supplemental witnesses, including identification on whether the witnesses will be called live or by deposition testimony and brief narrative descriptions of the witnesses’ expected testimony, and supplemental exhibits expected to be used in view of ATopTech’s supplemental witness list and exhibit list. Serve objections, if any, to supplemental exhibits and/or testimony of witnesses listed by ATopTech. Serve deposition excerpts expected to be used. 7/6/2016 Both Serve objections to deposition excerpts. 7/8/2016 10:00 AM Both Meet and confer to resolve objections to exhibits, testimony and/or deposition excerpts. 6 7 6/10/2016 8 9 10 11 6/20/2016 12 13 14 15 16 6/27/2016 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR) 1 7/11/2016 4 5 2. Both File oppositions to motions in limine, if any. Exchange Pre-Stamped Exhibits. 7/25/2016 3 File motions in limine, if any. 7/18/2016 2 Both Both Bench Trial Begins To the extent a document to be used as an exhibit at the Bench Trial was 6 previously marked either for identification or as a trial exhibit, the same exhibit number will be 7 used. Since these exhibits have already been exchanged, it will not be necessary to exchange a 8 copy of the Pre-Stamped Exhibit for these previously exhibits. The parties will mutually agree 9 upon a reasonable method for marking any exhibits not previously marked, and copies of any 10 such Pre-Stamped Exhibits will be exchanged in accordance with the schedule set forth above. 11 The parties further agree that the record from the jury trial held February 22, 2016 – March 8, 12 2016, will be considered as part of the record for the Bench Trial. 13 4. The exchange of exhibit lists and deposition designations contemplated above will 14 include where appropriate the exchange of native versions of the lists (i.e., excel or word 15 document) to facilitate objections and meeting and conferring to resolve those objections. To 16 facilitate review of the exhibit list, the Parties agree that, in addition to the columns set out in 17 ECF No. 174, the exchanged exhibit lists will include columns for Beg Bates and End Bates for 18 any document not previously marked either for identification or as a trial exhibit. For the 19 convenience of the Parties, the Parties agree to exchange searchable PDF versions of any exhibits 20 not previously marked for identification or as a trial exhibit (or native files as appropriate), in lieu 21 of the printed copies called for in ECF No. 174. The parties will mutually cooperate to ensure 22 that legible copies of any exhibits intended to be used at the bench trial are exchanged in advance, 23 and by July 18, 2015. Each party will provide two sets of printed copies of the exhibits it intends 24 to use at the Bench Trial to the Court on the first day of trial, as required by ECF No. 174. 25 5. The Parties will indicate which witnesses it intends to call live and which 26 witnesses it intends to call by deposition in accordance with the schedule set forth above, and will 27 provide any changes to this determination by July 18, 2016. The Parties further agree, however, 28 that should the need thereafter arise (e.g., a witness becomes unavailable) the Parties will not be -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR) 1 prohibited from later preparing deposition designations for that witness if appropriate. The 2 parties will exchange deposition designations only for those witnesses they actually plan to 3 submit to the Court for consideration, according to the schedule outlined above. The parties will 4 present to the Court excerpted transcripts annotating the designations, counter-designations, and 5 any objections. Should the Court wish the parties to present video deposition testimony at the 6 trial, the parties will meet and confer on a procedure to prepare the video clips. 7 6. The parties will exchange demonstratives to be used in opening statements or 8 initial statements to the Court on the first day of trial by no later than 5:30 p.m. on July 22, 2016. 9 To the extent there are objections, the parties will meet and confer in an effort to resolve those 10 objections by 12:00 p.m. on July 23, 2016. 11 7. By 5:30 pm on July 20, 2016, ATopTech will disclose the order of its witnesses 12 and any exhibits, including demonstrative exhibits, to be used with each witness disclosed 13 pursuant to paragraph 1. By 5:30 pm on July 21, 2016, Synopsys will provide any objections to 14 those exhibits and will disclose any cross exhibits for use with ATopTech’s witnesses. By 5:30 15 pm on July 21, 2016, Synopsys will disclose the order of its witnesses and any exhibits, including 16 demonstrative exhibits, to be used with each witness disclosed pursuant to paragraph 1. By 5:30 17 pm on July 22, 2016, ATopTech will provide any objections to those exhibits and will disclose 18 any cross exhibits for use with Synopsys’s witnesses. To the extent there are objections, the 19 parties will meet and confer in an effort to resolve those objections by 12:00 p.m. on July 23, 20 2016. 21 8. Any demonstratives will be provided to opposing counsel as a color copy in PDF 22 form. If a demonstrative contains video, animations, or “builds,” they will be provided to 23 opposing counsel on DVD, CD, thumb drive, or FTP. If good faith efforts to resolve objections 24 to demonstratives fail, the objecting party shall bring any outstanding objections to the Court’s 25 attention prior to use of the demonstratives. 26 9. The parties will identify the witnesses it intends to call, as well as the exhibits and 27 demonstratives to be used in connection with the testimony of those witnesses in accordance with 28 the schedule set forth in paragraphs 1 and 7 above and will meet and confer with respect to any -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR) 1 anticipated objections to the testimony or exhibits promptly as set forth above. Any unresolved 2 objections will be addressed at a time set by the Court. 3 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 6 JONES DAY 7 By: 8 /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt Robert A. Mittelstaedt Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 9 10 11 12 In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 13 14 Dated: June 7, 2016 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 15 16 By: 17 /s/ Paul Alexander Paul Alexander Attorneys for Defendant ATOPTECH, INC. 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 Dated: ___________________ June 8, 2016 ________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL EXCHANGES FOR THE BENCH TRIAL Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?