Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 823

ORDER granting Stipulation re 803 Letter Brief filed by Atoptech, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/27/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Paul Alexander (No. 49997)
[e-mail]
Martin R. Glick (No. 40187)
[e-mail]
Sean M. Callagy (No. 255230)
[e-mail]
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Philip W. Marsh (No. 276383)
E-Mail : [e-mail]
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Denise McKenzie (No. 193313)
[e-mail]
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
777 South Figueroa Street
Forty-Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)
[e-mail]
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
[e-mail]
Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604)
[e-mail]
David C. Kiernan (SBN 215335)
[e-mail]
Nathaniel P. Garrett (SBN 248211)
[e-mail]
Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
+1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700
Heather N. Fugitt (SBN 261588)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
Silicon Valley Office
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
+1.650.739.3939
Facsimile:
+1.650.739.3900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22

SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

v.

C a N o. 13- 02965- M C ( M R)
se
3: cvM
D
[P RO P O S E D ] O RD E R GRA N TI G
N
TH E P A RTI S ’J I T L E TTE R B RI F
E
O N
E
( KT. O . 03)TO TA KE
D
N 8
D E P O S I O N S O UT O F TI E
TI
M

ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.

Judge:
Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Courtroom: 4, 3rd Floor
1301 Clay Street, Oakland

27
28
Joint (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

1

The Court has received and considered the parties’ joint letter brief (Dkt. No. 803),

2

wherein the parties’ jointly request that the Court permit limited depositions to go forward after

3

the patent fact discovery deadline. After considering the parties’ joint submission, the Court finds

4

good cause to grant the parties’ motion.

5
6

Dated: July 25, 2016

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

7

By: / h lpW . arsh
s/P ii
M
Philip W. Marsh

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ATOPTECH, INC.

10
11
12

Respectfully submitted,

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.
JONES DAY

13

By: / oe C . i
s/J
L u
Joe C. Liu

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
SYNOPSYS, INC.

16
17
18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

19

(1) ATopTech is permitted to take the continued deposition of Mr. James Luo; and

20

(2) Synopsys is permitted the additional corporate witness(es) designated by ATopTech

21

for up to a total of two (2) hours on facts relating a particular patent license with a company

22

called Golden Gate Technology, Inc. and facts supporting ATopTech’s license defense.

S

July 27, 2016
Dated: _________________________
By:

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

RT

ER

H

28
36328106v1

-1-

LI

.R
onna M
Judge D

NO

27

FO

Hon. Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
yu

26

A

25

RT
U
O

24

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

R NIA

I S O O RD E RE D .
T
UNIT
ED

23

C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Joint (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

N