Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
839
JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER. Synopsys' claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice. ATopTech's defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 15, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)
ramittelstaedt@JonesDay.com
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
pmichael@jonesday.com
Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604)
ksschwartz@JonesDay.com
Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)
jcliu@JonesDay.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
+1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700
Paul Alexander (#49997)
Paul.Alexander@aporter.com
Martin R. Glick (#40187)
Marty.Glick@aporter.com
Sean M. Callagy (#255230)
Sean.Callagy@aporter.com
Willow White Noonan (#277584)
Willow.Noonan@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: (415) 471-3100
Facsimile: (415) 471-3400
Thomas W. Ritchie (pro hac vice)
twritchie@JonesDay.com
JONES DAY
77 W. Wacker Dr.
Chicago, IL 60601
Telephone:
+1.312.782.3939
Facsimile:
+1.312.782.8585
Philip W. Marsh (#276383)
Philip.Marsh@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone: (650) 798-2920
Facsimile: (650) 798-2999
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
19
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL
DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
ATOPTECH, INC.,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
1
STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.
3
(“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”), by and through their respective
4
counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
5
1.
Synopsys filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 25, 2013 alleging,
6
inter alia, ATopTech infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 (“the ’348 Patent”). ECF No. 43.
7
Synopsys repeated those allegations in its First Supplemental Amended Complaint, filed on
8
January 23, 2016. ECF No. 523.
9
10
11
12
13
2.
In its infringement contentions, Synopsys alleged that ATopTech infringes Claims
1-5, 7-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of the ’348 Patent.
3.
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court dismissed with prejudice Synopsys’
claim for infringement of Claims 15-19 of the ’348 Patent. ECF No. 763.
4.
The parties agree that all of Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the remaining
14
asserted claims of the ’348 Patent against ATopTech should be dismissed with prejudice as to all
15
past and present products made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by
16
ATopTech and that ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to the remaining asserted claims of the ’348
17
Patent should be dismissed without prejudice.
18
19
5.
The parties agree that each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to
Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the ’348 Patent.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: August 15, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
JONES DAY
By: /s/ Patrick T. Michael
Patrick T. Michael
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.
28
-1-
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
1
ARNOLD & PORTER
2
By: /s/ Philip W. Marsh
Philip W. Marsh
3
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.
4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT SO ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)(2) and the Parties’ stipulation,
that:
1.
Synopsys’ claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice.
2.
ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No.
6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice.
3.
Each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to Synopsys’ claim for
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348.
August 15, 2016
Dated: _________________________
16
By:
17
18
Hon. Maxine Chesney
United States District Judge
NAI-1501963924v1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?