Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 839

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER. Synopsys' claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice. ATopTech's defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 15, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359) ramittelstaedt@JonesDay.com Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745) pmichael@jonesday.com Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604) ksschwartz@JonesDay.com Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356) jcliu@JonesDay.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: +1.415.626.3939 Facsimile: +1.415.875.5700 Paul Alexander (#49997) Paul.Alexander@aporter.com Martin R. Glick (#40187) Marty.Glick@aporter.com Sean M. Callagy (#255230) Sean.Callagy@aporter.com Willow White Noonan (#277584) Willow.Noonan@aporter.com ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Telephone: (415) 471-3100 Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 Thomas W. Ritchie (pro hac vice) twritchie@JonesDay.com JONES DAY 77 W. Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: +1.312.782.3939 Facsimile: +1.312.782.8585 Philip W. Marsh (#276383) Philip.Marsh@aporter.com ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216 Telephone: (650) 798-2920 Facsimile: (650) 798-2999 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. Attorneys for Defendant ATOPTECH, INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 SYNOPSYS, INC., 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR) JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ATOPTECH, INC., 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR) 1 STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. 3 (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”), by and through their respective 4 counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 5 1. Synopsys filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 25, 2013 alleging, 6 inter alia, ATopTech infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 (“the ’348 Patent”). ECF No. 43. 7 Synopsys repeated those allegations in its First Supplemental Amended Complaint, filed on 8 January 23, 2016. ECF No. 523. 9 10 11 12 13 2. In its infringement contentions, Synopsys alleged that ATopTech infringes Claims 1-5, 7-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of the ’348 Patent. 3. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court dismissed with prejudice Synopsys’ claim for infringement of Claims 15-19 of the ’348 Patent. ECF No. 763. 4. The parties agree that all of Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the remaining 14 asserted claims of the ’348 Patent against ATopTech should be dismissed with prejudice as to all 15 past and present products made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by 16 ATopTech and that ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to the remaining asserted claims of the ’348 17 Patent should be dismissed without prejudice. 18 19 5. The parties agree that each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the ’348 Patent. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: August 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted, JONES DAY By: /s/ Patrick T. Michael Patrick T. Michael Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 28 -1- Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR) 1 ARNOLD & PORTER 2 By: /s/ Philip W. Marsh Philip W. Marsh 3 Attorneys for Defendant ATOPTECH, INC. 4 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT SO ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)(2) and the Parties’ stipulation, that: 1. Synopsys’ claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice. 2. ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice. 3. Each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to Synopsys’ claim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348. August 15, 2016 Dated: _________________________ 16 By: 17 18 Hon. Maxine Chesney United States District Judge NAI-1501963924v1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?