Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 839

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER. Synopsys' claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice. ATopTech's defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 15, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)
[e-mail]
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
[e-mail]
Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604)
[e-mail]
Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
+1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700

Paul Alexander (#49997)
[e-mail]
Martin R. Glick (#40187)
[e-mail]
Sean M. Callagy (#255230)
[e-mail]
Willow White Noonan (#277584)
[e-mail]
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Thomas W. Ritchie (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
77 W. Wacker Dr.
Chicago, IL 60601
Telephone:
+1.312.782.3939
Facsimile:
+1.312.782.8585

Philip W. Marsh (#276383)
[e-mail]
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

19

Plaintiff,

20

v.

21

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL
DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

ATOPTECH, INC.,

22

Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

1

STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

2

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.

3

(“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”), by and through their respective

4

counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

5

1.

Synopsys filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 25, 2013 alleging,

6

inter alia, ATopTech infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 (“the ’348 Patent”). ECF No. 43.

7

Synopsys repeated those allegations in its First Supplemental Amended Complaint, filed on

8

January 23, 2016. ECF No. 523.

9
10
11
12
13

2.

In its infringement contentions, Synopsys alleged that ATopTech infringes Claims

1-5, 7-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of the ’348 Patent.
3.

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court dismissed with prejudice Synopsys’

claim for infringement of Claims 15-19 of the ’348 Patent. ECF No. 763.
4.

The parties agree that all of Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the remaining

14

asserted claims of the ’348 Patent against ATopTech should be dismissed with prejudice as to all

15

past and present products made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by

16

ATopTech and that ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to the remaining asserted claims of the ’348

17

Patent should be dismissed without prejudice.

18
19

5.

The parties agree that each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to

Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the ’348 Patent.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: August 15, 2016

Respectfully submitted,
JONES DAY
By: /s/ Patrick T. Michael
Patrick T. Michael
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

28
-1-

Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

1

ARNOLD & PORTER

2

By: /s/ Philip W. Marsh
Philip W. Marsh

3

Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.

4
5

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

IT SO ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)(2) and the Parties’ stipulation,
that:
1.

Synopsys’ claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent

No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice.
2.

ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No.

6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice.
3.

Each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to Synopsys’ claim for

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348.
August 15, 2016
Dated: _________________________

16

By:

17
18

Hon. Maxine Chesney
United States District Judge

NAI-1501963924v1

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)