Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
840
ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPIES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 16, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
11
12
13
No. C-13-2965 MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPIES
v.
ATOPTECH, INC.,
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
On August 12, 2016, defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) filed its “Proposed
17
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Affirmative Defense of Equitable
18
Estoppel.” ATopTech has violated the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to
19
provide a chambers copy of said filing in single-sided format. See Standing Orders For
20
Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2; see also Civil L.R. 3-4
21
(setting forth the requirements for “papers presented for filing”); Civil L.R. 3-4(c)(2)
22
(providing “text must appear on one side only”).
23
Accordingly, ATopTech is hereby ORDERED to comply with this Court’s Standing
24
Orders by immediately submitting a single-sided chambers copy of the above-referenced
25
document.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 16, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?