Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filing
856
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY AND ORDER. The expert discovery cutoff is extended to October 22, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/03/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)
ramittelstaedt@JonesDay.com
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
pmichael@jonesday.com
Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604)
ksschwartz@JonesDay.com
Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)
jcliu@JonesDay.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
+1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700
Thomas W. Ritchie (pro hac vice)
twritchie@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
77 W. Wacker Dr.
Chicago, IL 60601
Telephone:
+1.312.782.3939
Facsimile:
+1.312.782.8585
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
14
15
Paul Alexander (#49997)
Paul.Alexander@aporter.com
Martin R. Glick (#40187)
Marty.Glick@aporter.com
Sean M. Callagy (#255230)
Sean.Callagy@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: (415) 471-3100
Facsimile: (415) 471-3400
Philip W. Marsh, (#276383)
Philip.marsh@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone: (650) 798-2920
Facsimile: (650) 798-2999
Denise McKenzie (#193313)
Denise.McKenzie@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
777 South Figueroa Street
Forty-Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
Telephone: (213) 243-4000
Facsimile: (213) 243-4199
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
22
Plaintiff,
23
v.
24
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
EXPERT DISCOVERY AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
ATOPTECH, INC.,
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
1
2
3
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY
Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”), by
and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
The Order Regarding Deadlines and Discovery Limits for Synopsys’ Patent
5
Claims (Counts II-V) (Dkt. No. 291) sets a deadline of October 15, 2016 for the close of expert
6
discovery.
7
8
9
10
11
2.
Because of difficulties associated with scheduling the depositions of the seven (7)
experts in the case, the parties agree that an extension of one week for expert discovery is needed.
3.
Accordingly, the parties request that the Court enter the attached (proposed) order
extending the close of expert discovery by one week to October 22, 2016.
4.
The parties do not believe that the requested extension will require any other
12
changes to the schedule. Specifically, the remaining deadlines for filing summary judgment
13
motions, the pre-trial conference, and trial would remain the same.
14
15
Dated: September 30, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
16
ARNOLD & PORTER
17
By: /s/ Philip W. Marsh
Philip W. Marsh
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
ATOPTECH, INC.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.
JONES DAY
By: /s/ Joe C. Liu
Joe C. Liu
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
27
28
-2-
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT SO ORDERED, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, that:
1.
The Order Regarding Deadlines and Discovery Limits for Synopsys’ Patent
Claims (Counts II-V) (Dkt. No. 291) is amended such that the deadline for “Expert Discovery
Cutoff” is changed to October 22, 2016.
2.
All other deadlines in the case remain unchanged.
8
9
10
Dated: _________________________
October 3, 2016
By:
Hon. Maxine Chesney
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?