Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 914

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. The motion is denied, without prejudice to re-filing after the patent claims have been resolved. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/9/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

v.
ATOPTECH, INC,
Defendant.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED
MOTION FOR FINAL ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 875

12
13

Before the Court is plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s (“Synopsys”) “Renewed Motion for

14

Entry of Final Judgment,” filed October 28, 2016, by which Synopsys seeks, pursuant to

15

Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, entry of final judgment on its copyright

16

and contract claims in the above-titled action. Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”)

17

has filed opposition, to which Synopsys has replied. The matter came on regularly for

18

hearing on December 9, 2016. Patrick T. Michael, Krista S. Schwartz, and Nathaniel P.

19

Garrett of Jones Day appeared on behalf of Synopsys and Paul Alexander and Philip W.

20

Marsh of Arnold & Porter LLP appeared on behalf of ATopTech.

21

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the motion is hereby DENIED,

22

without prejudice to re-filing after the patent claims in the instant action have been

23

resolved.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: December 9, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge