Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 957

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/12/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
ATOPTECH, INC,

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S
STANDING ORDERS

Defendant.

12
13

In connection with the pending motions for summary judgment, defendant

14

ATopTech, Inc. has electronically filed, inter alia, the following four documents: (1)

15

“Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s Opposition to Synopsys, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary

16

Judgment,” filed December 29, 2016; (2) “Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s Administrative

17

Motion to File Documents Under Seal,” filed December 29, 2016; (3) “Defendant

18

ATopTech, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the

19

Patent Claims,” filed January 5, 2017; and (4) “Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s

20

Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal,” filed January 5, 2017. With

21

respect to each such document, defendant has violated the Civil Local Rules of this

22

District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a

23

paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked 'Chambers Copy'."

24

See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

25

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

26

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the

27

Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-

28

referenced documents. Defendant is again advised that if it in the future to comply with

1

the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed

2

document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the

3

record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely

4

provided to the Court.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: January 12, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2