Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filing 957

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/12/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. ATOPTECH, INC, Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS Defendant. 12 13 In connection with the pending motions for summary judgment, defendant 14 ATopTech, Inc. has electronically filed, inter alia, the following four documents: (1) 15 “Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s Opposition to Synopsys, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary 16 Judgment,” filed December 29, 2016; (2) “Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s Administrative 17 Motion to File Documents Under Seal,” filed December 29, 2016; (3) “Defendant 18 ATopTech, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the 19 Patent Claims,” filed January 5, 2017; and (4) “Defendant ATopTech, Inc.’s 20 Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal,” filed January 5, 2017. With 21 respect to each such document, defendant has violated the Civil Local Rules of this 22 District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a 23 paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked 'Chambers Copy'." 24 See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The 25 Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. 26 Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 27 Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 28 referenced documents. Defendant is again advised that if it in the future to comply with 1 the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed 2 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 3 record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely 4 provided to the Court. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: January 12, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?