Moretti v. The Hertz Corporation et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Briefing Schedule for Motions to Dismiss. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint or, in the Alternative, Transfer This Action to the District of Delaware , 17 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3). Responses due by 9/16/2013. Replies due by 9/26/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/11/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 08/23/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)
1 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446)
2 SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427)
3 MARIE A. MCCRARY (State Bar No. 262670)
835 Douglass Street
4 San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 639-9090
5 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(SAN FRANCISCO)
8
9
10 ENRICO MORETTI, individually and on
behalf of Class Members,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14 THE HERTZ CORPORATION; HERTZ
GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.; DOLLAR
15 THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.;
HOTWIRE, INC.; and DOES 1 THROUGH
16 25,
17
Case No. CV 13 2972
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Case No. CV 13 2972
1
The parties to this action have conferred and reached agreement, subject to the approval
2 of the Court, to extend the briefing schedule for the currently pending motions to dismiss (Dkt.##
3
15, 17). In support of this stipulation, the parties recite and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS on May 24, 2013, plaintiff Enrico Moretti (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative
5
6
class action in California state court (San Francisco county);
WHEREAS on June 28, 2013, defendants The Hertz Corporation, Hertz Global Holdings,
7
8 Inc. (collectively “Hertz”), and Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group (“DTAG”) removed the action
9 to this Court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d) & 1453;
10
11
WHEREAS on July 3, 2013, Plaintiff, Hertz, and DTAG stipulated to extend the answer
date and to set an agreed to briefing schedule on the forthcoming motions to dismiss (Dkt.# 11);
12
WHEREAS on July 3, 2013, this Court signed the parties’ stipulation, and set the
13
14
following briefing schedule for motions to dismiss:
(1)
The date on which defendants shall answer or otherwise plead is extended until
August 5, 2013;
(2)
If any defendant files a motion to dismiss on the answer date, plaintiff shall have
until August 26, 2013 to file a response to that motion;
(3)
Defendant(s) shall have until September 6, 2013 to file a reply in support of the
motion(s) to dismiss; and
(4)
15
The hearing on any motion to dismiss, should one be filed, shall be on
September 27, 2013.
16
17
18
19
20
21
(Dkt.# 12.)
22
WHEREAS on August 5, 2013, Defendant Hotwire, Inc. (“Hotwire”) filed a motion to
23
24
dismiss (Dkt.# 15);
25
WHEREAS Hertz and DTAG filed a joint motion to dismiss the same day (Dkt.# 17);
26
WHEREAS Defendants have agreed to provide Plaintiff with additional time to respond
27
to their motions to dismiss (Dkt.## 15, 17);
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Case No. CV 13 2972
2224974.1
1
WHEREAS the parties urge the Court to accept their stipulated schedule as the product of
2 the parties’ agreement and in the belief that it will lessen the burden on the Court;
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to Court approval:
4
(1)
Plaintiff shall have until September 16, 2013 to file a response to Defendants’
motions to compel (Dkt.## 15, 17);
(2)
Defendants shall have until September 26, 2013 to file a reply in support of their
motion to dismiss; and
(3)
The hearing on the motions to dismiss shall be on October 10, 2013 or on any
date thereafter that the Court deems appropriate and convenient.
5
6
7
8
9
STIPULATED AND AGREED:
10
11
Dated: August 23, 2013
12
PLAINTIFF ENRICO MORETTI
By:
13
14
15
16
/s/ Seth Safier
Seth Safier
Adam Gutride
Marie A. McCrary
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglass Street
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 529-4995
17
Dated: August 23, 2013
18
19
20
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, HERTZ GLOBAL
HOLDINGS, INC., AND DOLLAR THRIFTY
AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
By:
21
22
23
24
/s/Jeffrey A. Koppy
Kenneth E. Keller (SBN 71450)
Tracy M. Clements (SBN 184150)
KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND LLP
555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 249-8330
Facsimile: (415) 249-8333
25
Ross B. Bricker (admitted pro hac vice)
Jeffrey A. Koppy (admitted pro hac vice)
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
353 N. Clark Street
Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Case No. CV 13 2972
2224974.1
1
Telephone: (312) 222-9350
Facsimile: (312) 840-7711
2
3 Dated August 23, 2013
HOTWIRE, INC.
4
By:
5
6
7
/s/Rodney Strickland
Rodney G. Strickland, Jr.
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 320-4857
8
9
10
ORDER
11
The parties having stipulated and good cause appearing, the Court adopts the parties’
stipulated agreement and resets deadlines as follows:
12
(1)
Plaintiff shall have until September 16, 2013 to file a response to Defendants’
motions to compel (Dkt.## 15, 17);
(2)
Defendants shall have until September 26, 2013 to file a reply in support of their
motions to dismiss; and
(3)
The hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Dkt.# 15, 17) shall be on
October 11, 2013.
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
08/23/2013
20 Dated: ______________________
21
RED
RDE
________________________________________
IS SO O FIED
IT
Hon. Samuel Conti, United States District Judge
MODI
AS
l Conti
NO
22
UNIT
ED
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
18
amue
Judge S
24
25
A
H
ER
LI
RT
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Case No. CV 13 2972
2224974.1
R NIA
14
FO
13
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?