Moretti v. The Hertz Corporation et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Briefing Schedule for Motions to Dismiss. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint or, in the Alternative, Transfer This Action to the District of Delaware , 17 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3). Responses due by 9/16/2013. Replies due by 9/26/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/11/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 08/23/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446) 2 SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427) 3 MARIE A. MCCRARY (State Bar No. 262670) 835 Douglass Street 4 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 639-9090 5 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) 8 9 10 ENRICO MORETTI, individually and on behalf of Class Members, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 THE HERTZ CORPORATION; HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.; DOLLAR 15 THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.; HOTWIRE, INC.; and DOES 1 THROUGH 16 25, 17 Case No. CV 13 2972 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. CV 13 2972 1 The parties to this action have conferred and reached agreement, subject to the approval 2 of the Court, to extend the briefing schedule for the currently pending motions to dismiss (Dkt.## 3 15, 17). In support of this stipulation, the parties recite and agree as follows: 4 WHEREAS on May 24, 2013, plaintiff Enrico Moretti (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative 5 6 class action in California state court (San Francisco county); WHEREAS on June 28, 2013, defendants The Hertz Corporation, Hertz Global Holdings, 7 8 Inc. (collectively “Hertz”), and Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group (“DTAG”) removed the action 9 to this Court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d) & 1453; 10 11 WHEREAS on July 3, 2013, Plaintiff, Hertz, and DTAG stipulated to extend the answer date and to set an agreed to briefing schedule on the forthcoming motions to dismiss (Dkt.# 11); 12 WHEREAS on July 3, 2013, this Court signed the parties’ stipulation, and set the 13 14 following briefing schedule for motions to dismiss: (1) The date on which defendants shall answer or otherwise plead is extended until August 5, 2013; (2) If any defendant files a motion to dismiss on the answer date, plaintiff shall have until August 26, 2013 to file a response to that motion; (3) Defendant(s) shall have until September 6, 2013 to file a reply in support of the motion(s) to dismiss; and (4) 15 The hearing on any motion to dismiss, should one be filed, shall be on September 27, 2013. 16 17 18 19 20 21 (Dkt.# 12.) 22 WHEREAS on August 5, 2013, Defendant Hotwire, Inc. (“Hotwire”) filed a motion to 23 24 dismiss (Dkt.# 15); 25 WHEREAS Hertz and DTAG filed a joint motion to dismiss the same day (Dkt.# 17); 26 WHEREAS Defendants have agreed to provide Plaintiff with additional time to respond 27 to their motions to dismiss (Dkt.## 15, 17); 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. CV 13 2972 2224974.1 1 WHEREAS the parties urge the Court to accept their stipulated schedule as the product of 2 the parties’ agreement and in the belief that it will lessen the burden on the Court; 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to Court approval: 4 (1) Plaintiff shall have until September 16, 2013 to file a response to Defendants’ motions to compel (Dkt.## 15, 17); (2) Defendants shall have until September 26, 2013 to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss; and (3) The hearing on the motions to dismiss shall be on October 10, 2013 or on any date thereafter that the Court deems appropriate and convenient. 5 6 7 8 9 STIPULATED AND AGREED: 10 11 Dated: August 23, 2013 12 PLAINTIFF ENRICO MORETTI By: 13 14 15 16 /s/ Seth Safier Seth Safier Adam Gutride Marie A. McCrary GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP 835 Douglass Street San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 529-4995 17 Dated: August 23, 2013 18 19 20 THE HERTZ CORPORATION, HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC., AND DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP By: 21 22 23 24 /s/Jeffrey A. Koppy Kenneth E. Keller (SBN 71450) Tracy M. Clements (SBN 184150) KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND LLP 555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 249-8330 Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 25 Ross B. Bricker (admitted pro hac vice) Jeffrey A. Koppy (admitted pro hac vice) JENNER & BLOCK LLP 353 N. Clark Street Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. CV 13 2972 2224974.1 1 Telephone: (312) 222-9350 Facsimile: (312) 840-7711 2 3 Dated August 23, 2013 HOTWIRE, INC. 4 By: 5 6 7 /s/Rodney Strickland Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 320-4857 8 9 10 ORDER 11 The parties having stipulated and good cause appearing, the Court adopts the parties’ stipulated agreement and resets deadlines as follows: 12 (1) Plaintiff shall have until September 16, 2013 to file a response to Defendants’ motions to compel (Dkt.## 15, 17); (2) Defendants shall have until September 26, 2013 to file a reply in support of their motions to dismiss; and (3) The hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Dkt.# 15, 17) shall be on October 11, 2013. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 08/23/2013 20 Dated: ______________________ 21 RED RDE ________________________________________ IS SO O FIED IT Hon. Samuel Conti, United States District Judge MODI AS l Conti NO 22 UNIT ED 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 18 amue Judge S 24 25 A H ER LI RT 23 N F D IS T IC T O R 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. CV 13 2972 2224974.1 R NIA 14 FO 13 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?