Banko v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 16

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/8/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID J. MICLEAN (SB# 115098) Email: dmiclean@micleangleason.com GARY R. GLEASON (SB# 136167) Email: ggleason@micleangleason.com ANNE-MARIE D. DAO (SB#282632) Email: adao@micleangleason.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSHUA BANKO 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 JOSHUA BANKO, Plaintiff(s), 10 Miclean Gleason LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 310 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. 11 12 Case No. CV 13-02977 RS APPLE, INC., DOES 1-50 Defendant(s). 13 14 15 16 Pursuant to Federal Rule 6 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Joshua Banko (“Banko”) 17 18 19 20 and Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby stipulate to an adjustment of the briefing schedule on Apple’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) and would respectfully request an order confirming such stipulation: 21 1. On June 27, 2013, Banko filed a Complaint against Apple. (Dkt. 1). 22 2. On July 10, 2013, the parties stipulated to an extension of time to allow Apple 23 to file a responsive pleading to Banko’s Complaint. (Dkt. 4). 24 3. 25 (“Motion”). (Dkt. 11). On August 5, 2013, Apple filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 26 27 28 1 CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME Banko’s Opposition is presently due on August 19, 2013. Apple’s Reply to 4. 2 the Opposition is currently due on August 26, 2013. The hearing on Apple’s Motion 3 is scheduled for September 26, 2013. 4 5. 5 opposition brief and Apple’s reply brief on the Motion. These extensions will not 6 affect the hearing date. The reason for such request is because this is a critical 7 Motion attacking all causes of action in the complaint and plaintiff will need 8 sufficient time to review the extensive authority that has been cited by Apple and to 9 respond accordingly. Further, key counsel of record from Miclean Gleason are on 10 vacation and it would be a hardship on these individuals to have to return early to 11 Miclean Gleason LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 310 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax 1 respond to Apple’s Motion. 12 6. 13 approval of, a revised briefing schedule under which Banko’s Opposition brief will 14 now be due on August 26, 2013 and Apple’s Rely brief on the Motion will now be 15 due September 5, 2013. 16 7. 17 on Apple’s Motion (September 26, 2013). A proposed order is attached. The parties have agreed to a short extension of time for the filing of Banko’s Therefore, the parties have stipulated and agreed to, and seek the Court’s The parties propose no change in the currently scheduled date for the hearing 18 19 STIPULATION 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby stipulate that: Banko’s 21 Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) will now be due no later than 22 August 26, 2013, and Apple’s Reply to Banko’s Opposition will now be due no later 23 than September 5, 2013. The hearing on Apple’s Motion to Dismiss will remain set 24 as previously scheduled by the Court on September 26, 2013, at 1:30 pm. 25 26 27 28 2 CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME 1 Dated: August 8, 2013 //s// Todd K. Boyer TODD K. BOYER LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: August 8, 2013 //s/ David J. Miclean DAVID J. MICLEAN GARY R. GLEASON ANNE-MARIE D. DAO MICLEAN GLEASON LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSHUA BANKO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Miclean Gleason LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 310 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax 11 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 14 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 Date: August 8 , 2013 ____________________________ The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?