Banko v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
16
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/8/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
DAVID J. MICLEAN (SB# 115098)
Email: dmiclean@micleangleason.com
GARY R. GLEASON (SB# 136167)
Email: ggleason@micleangleason.com
ANNE-MARIE D. DAO (SB#282632)
Email: adao@micleangleason.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSHUA BANKO
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
JOSHUA BANKO,
Plaintiff(s),
10
Miclean Gleason LLP
100 Marine Parkway Suite 310
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax
JOINT STIPULATION
REQUESTING ORDER
CHANGING TIME FOR
BRIEFING ON APPLE INC.’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
11
12
Case No. CV 13-02977 RS
APPLE, INC., DOES 1-50
Defendant(s).
13
14
15
16
Pursuant to Federal Rule 6 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Joshua Banko (“Banko”)
17
18
19
20
and Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby stipulate to an adjustment of the briefing schedule
on Apple’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) and would respectfully request an order
confirming such stipulation:
21
1.
On June 27, 2013, Banko filed a Complaint against Apple. (Dkt. 1).
22
2.
On July 10, 2013, the parties stipulated to an extension of time to allow Apple
23
to file a responsive pleading to Banko’s Complaint. (Dkt. 4).
24
3.
25
(“Motion”). (Dkt. 11).
On August 5, 2013, Apple filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint
26
27
28
1
CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME
Banko’s Opposition is presently due on August 19, 2013. Apple’s Reply to
4.
2
the Opposition is currently due on August 26, 2013. The hearing on Apple’s Motion
3
is scheduled for September 26, 2013.
4
5.
5
opposition brief and Apple’s reply brief on the Motion. These extensions will not
6
affect the hearing date. The reason for such request is because this is a critical
7
Motion attacking all causes of action in the complaint and plaintiff will need
8
sufficient time to review the extensive authority that has been cited by Apple and to
9
respond accordingly. Further, key counsel of record from Miclean Gleason are on
10
vacation and it would be a hardship on these individuals to have to return early to
11
Miclean Gleason LLP
100 Marine Parkway Suite 310
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax
1
respond to Apple’s Motion.
12
6.
13
approval of, a revised briefing schedule under which Banko’s Opposition brief will
14
now be due on August 26, 2013 and Apple’s Rely brief on the Motion will now be
15
due September 5, 2013.
16
7.
17
on Apple’s Motion (September 26, 2013). A proposed order is attached.
The parties have agreed to a short extension of time for the filing of Banko’s
Therefore, the parties have stipulated and agreed to, and seek the Court’s
The parties propose no change in the currently scheduled date for the hearing
18
19
STIPULATION
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby stipulate that: Banko’s
21
Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) will now be due no later than
22
August 26, 2013, and Apple’s Reply to Banko’s Opposition will now be due no later
23
than September 5, 2013. The hearing on Apple’s Motion to Dismiss will remain set
24
as previously scheduled by the Court on September 26, 2013, at 1:30 pm.
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME
1
Dated: August 8, 2013
//s// Todd K. Boyer
TODD K. BOYER
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
Dated: August 8, 2013
//s/ David J. Miclean
DAVID J. MICLEAN
GARY R. GLEASON
ANNE-MARIE D. DAO
MICLEAN GLEASON LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSHUA BANKO
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Miclean Gleason LLP
100 Marine Parkway Suite 310
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-684-1181 Main 650-684-1181 Fax
11
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER
13
14
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Date: August 8 , 2013
____________________________
The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
CASE NO: CV 13-02977 RS
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER CHANGING TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?