Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc.
Filing
47
ORDER PARTIALLY LIFTING STAY. Case Management Statement due by 8/8/2014. Case Management Conference set for 8/15/2014 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/29/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 13-02980 JSW
v.
SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC.,
13
ORDER PARTIALLY LIFTING
STAY
Defendant.
/
14
15
The Court stayed this action pending the United States Patent & Trademark Office
16
Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) decision on whether to grant or deny the petitions
17
for inter partes review (“IPR”) challenging the validity of Plaintiff Riverbed Technology, Inc.’s
18
(“Riverbed”) patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,217,688 (the “’688 Patent”) and 8,321,580 (the “’580
19
Patent”), as well as Silver Peak Systems, Inc.’s (“Silver Peak”) patent, U.S. Patent No.
20
8,392,684 (the “’684 Patent”). The parties have informed the Court that the IPR of Riverbed’s
21
patents is now complete and, thus, request that the Court lift the stay as to the claims regarding
22
Riverbed’s patents, the ’688 Patent and the ’580 Patent. The Court HEREBY PARTIALLY
23
LIFTS the stay in the above captioned matter. The Court SETS a further case management
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
conference in this for August 15, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file a joint further case
2
management statement by no later than August 8, 2014.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: July 29, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?