MacDonald et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 62

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE re #61 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER for Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 27, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JEAN MACDONALD, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-02988-JST

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

v.
9
10

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Re: ECF No. 61

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
The parties to this case have submitted a stipulated request for a protective order, and a

12
13

proposed protective order for the Court’s approval. ECF No. 61.
Because the proposed protective order differs from the Northern District of California’s

14
15

model protective order in material respects, see Stipulated Protective Order for Standard

16

Litigation, available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-orders, the Court hereby

17

denies the stipulation without prejudice to the refiling of a revised protective order.

18

In any re-submitted order, the parties should either include the following paragraphs from

19

the Court’s model order, or explain why the language should be omitted: ¶¶ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.1, 5.2(a),

20

6, 9(b).

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 27, 2015

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge