Karrigan v. DataX, Ltd. et al

Filing 17

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 11 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 10/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

DAVID KARRIGAN, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

No. C 13-2995 SI
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

v.
DATAX, LTD, et al.,
Defendants.

/

16
17
18

In response to defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Docket No.
15. Accordingly, the Court DENIES defendants’ motion as moot. Docket No. 11.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 23, 2013
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE