East Bay Investments, LLC v. Sagun et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 14 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Plaintiff, 12 13 No. C 13-3017 SI EAST BAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. JIMMY SAGUN and LISA SAGUN, Defendants. / 16 On June 28, 2013, pro se defendants Jimmy Sagun and Lisa Sagun removed this unlawful 17 detainer action from state court, asserting federal question jurisdiction as the basis for removal. This 18 case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Spero, and on July 2, 2013, Judge Spero issued an 19 Order to Show Cause directing defendants to show why the case should not be remanded to state court. 20 Defendants did not respond to Order to Show Cause. On July 19, 2013, Judge Spero issued a Report 21 and Recommendation finding that removal was untimely, and that there is no jurisdiction because there 22 are no federal claims alleged in the unlawful detainer complaint and there is no basis for diversity 23 jurisdiction. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the August 2, 2013 24 deadline. This case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. 25 The Court has reviewed the Notice of Removal and Judge Spero’s Report and Recommendation, 26 and concludes that removal was improper and that this Court lacks jurisdiction for the reasons stated 27 in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 28 1 and REMANDS this case to the Superior Court for the County of Alameda. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: August 5, 2013 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?