Selleck v. Rode et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Selecting ADR Process filed by Linda Buckbee Selleck. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2013)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Linda Buckbee Selleck,
Plaintiff(s),
v.

CASE NO. CV-13-3055 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Keith Rode and
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
☐
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Parties will select a private
mediator after the completion of discovery and dispositive motions, subject to
agreement of all parties on an appropriate fee split.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )


other requested deadline: Following discovery and dispositive motions
WEISBERG & MILLER

Dated: September 17, 2013
____________/s/______________________________
Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr., of counsel, for Plaintiff

MOSS & BARNETT

Dated: September 17, 2013

_____________/s/_____________________________
Thomas J. Shroyer, Counsel for Defendant
CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP

_____________/s/_____________________________
Defendant Keith Rode, in pro per
Dated: September 17, 2013

[PROPOSED] ORDER
XX
☐
☐

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2013
Jon S. Tigar, United States District Court Judge

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
2396130v1