Whalen v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 186

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #185 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Modifications to Case Management Conference Date, and Discovery and Class Certification Deadlines filed by Ford Motor Company Class Certification Motion Hearing sreet for 5/26/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/25/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) redwards@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. #126539) banderson@omm.com SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) shammack@omm.com DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) ddorey@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 In re: Case No. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 18 MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION 20 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE, AND DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 21 [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] 22 Judge: 19 Hon. Edward M. Chen 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, the current fact discovery deadline in this matter is December 9, 2015; 2 WHEREAS, the amount of fact discovery exchanged in the litigation has been particularly 3 4 voluminous, both in terms of documents and depositions; WHEREAS, Ford and Plaintiffs have been working together cooperatively to complete 5 the fact discovery process in this litigation, and Ford and Plaintiffs have resolved nearly all 6 discovery issues without need for this Court’s intervention; 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested additional Rule 30(b)(6) testimony from Ford on 8 certain pricing and related issues, and the parties have agreed that Dennis Curlew, Ford’s 9 designee, will be produced for deposition on December 15, 2015; 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested the deposition of Graydon Reitz, who resides in 11 Australia, and Ford has agreed to make Mr. Reitz available for deposition on January 21, 2016, 12 during his next earliest trip to the United States; 13 WHEREAS Ford requires additional time to complete the voluminous privilege review 14 and production of its final privilege log (along with any responsive documents ultimately 15 determined not to be privileged in the final privilege review); 16 WHEREAS, Ford and Plaintiffs require very modest extensions of various existing 17 deadlines set in this case to complete the additional discovery listed above and to accommodate 18 related expert reports and filings consistent with those dates; 19 20 21 WHEREAS, none of the various deadline extensions stipulated by Ford and Plaintiffs will require any change to the dates set for trial of the matter; WHEREAS, Lead Counsel for Ford has a conflict with the date of the next Case 22 Management Conference, scheduled for December 17, because a summary judgment argument in 23 another court has been scheduled for the same day; 24 WHEREAS, Counsel for Ford obtained from the Court’s Scheduling Clerk potential 25 alternative dates for a Case Management Conference, subject to Court approval, and has 26 discussed those dates with Plaintiffs’ counsel; 27 28 WHEREAS, execution of this Stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs or Ford otherwise may have; -1- STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the parties reserve the right to seek further modification of the above dates should the depositions of Messrs. Curlew and Reitz require so; and WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief pursuant to a stipulation by the parties; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 1. The fact discovery deadline in this matter is extended from December 9, 2015 to 8 January 21, 2016 solely for the purpose of allowing Plaintiffs to complete the 9 depositions of Ford’s 30(b)(6) designee Dennis Curlew and Graydon Reitz and for 10 11 Ford to complete and produce any outstanding portions of Ford’s privilege log; 2. 12 13 The December 9, 2015 fact discovery deadline remains in place for all other fact discovery matters; 3. Plaintiffs’ deadline for producing the disclosure and report of their economic 14 expert witness(es) with respect to class certification is moved to January 7, 2016, 15 but Plaintiffs’ other class certification expert disclosures (i.e. non-economic expert 16 witnesses) and reports remain due on November 28, 2015; 17 4. The next Case Management Conference in this matter is continued to January 28, 18 2016 from December 17, 2015. The deadline to file an updated joint status report 19 is extended to January 21, 2016 from December 10, 2015. 20 5. 21 22 Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing their motion for class certification is extended to January 28, 2016 from January 14, 2016; 6. Ford’s deadline for responding to Plaintiffs’ class certification motion and for 23 producing class certification expert disclosures and reports is extended to March 24 15, 2016 from March 3, 2016; 25 7. Plaintiffs’ deadline to submit a reply brief in support of their motion for class 26 certification and their rebuttal expert disclosures and reports is extended to May 2, 27 2016 from April 21, 2016; and 28 8. May 26, The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is extended to May 19, -2- STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 1 2016 from May 12, 2016. 2 3 Dated: November 24, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 4 5 6 By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 1 Dated: November 24, 2015 BARON & BUDD, P.C. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Mark Pifko Mark Pifko Steve W. Berman HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: (206) 623-7292 Fax: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com Adam J. Levitt GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Tel: (312) 214-0000 Fax: (312) 214-0001 alevitt@gelaw.com Roland Tellis (186269) Mark Pifko (228412) BARON & BUDD, P.C. 15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 Encino, California 91436 Tel: (818) 839-2320 Fax: (818) 986-9698 rtellis@baronbudd.com mpifko@baronbudd.com Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice) Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice) CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP One Haverford Centre 361 West Lancaster Avenue Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 Tel: (610) 642-8500 Fax: (610) 649-3633 JGS@chimicles.com MDS@chimicles.com Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 27 28 -4- STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES 1 2 3 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 4 5 6 Dated: November 24, 2015 Randall W. Edwards O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards 9 Attorney for Defendant Ford Motor Company 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 S RT 21 22 R NIA dwa Judge E ER H 20 hen rd M. C NO 19 FO 18 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO LI 17 The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge UNIT ED 16 DATED: November __, 2015 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 15 25 (Modified on p. 2) A 13 ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- STIPULATION REGARDING CMC, DISCOVERY & CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?