Whalen v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 191

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #189 Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Michael Ervin, etc. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/22/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

STEVE W. BERMAN (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN
SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, Washington 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
ROLAND TELLIS (186269)
BARON & BUDD, P.C.
15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600
Encino, California 91436
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

ADAM J. LEVITT (pro hac vice)
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2350
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
JOSEPH G. SAUDER (pro hac vice)
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
One Haverford Centre
361 West Lancaster Avenue
Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

12
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18
19

IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER
LITIGATION

No. 13-cv-3072-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, on November 25, 2015, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court scheduled
a Case Management Conference for January 28, 2016, with an updated joint status report due
January 21, 2016 (ECF No. 186);
WHEREAS, Ford and Plaintiffs have been working together cooperatively to complete the

5
6
7

fact discovery process in this litigation, and Ford and Plaintiffs have no existing disputes concerning
the discovery that remains to be completed;

8

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is due January 28, 2016 (id.);

9

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for

10
11

May 26, 2016 (id.);
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and determined that they would respectfully suggest

12
to the Court that, in light of the foregoing, a Case Management Conference is not presently
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

necessary;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel
of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
1.

The Case Management Conference scheduled for January 28, 2016 is continued to a

date to be determined by the Court;
2.

The parties shall file an updated joint status report seven (7) days prior to the next

20
Case Management Conference.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: January 13, 2016

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
By:

/s/ Adam J. Levitt
Adam J. Levitt
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2350
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - 1
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC

By:

1
2
3
4
5
6

Janet L. Conigliaro (pro hac vice)
DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC
400 Renaissance Center
Detroit, Michigan 48243
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

RT

. Chen

dward M

Judge E

ER

A

H

17

R NIA

NO

16

ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO

FO

15

RT
U
O

14

LI

13

IT IS SO ORDERED that the further CMC
is reset from 1/28/16 to 3/24/16 at
10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC
statement shall be filed by 3/17/16.
_________________________________ S DISTRIC
TC
TE
Edward M. Chen
TA
U.S. District Judge
S

12

Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company

UNIT
ED

11

/s/ Randall W. Edwards
Randall W. Edwards (179053)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - 2
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing.

4

6

/s/ Adam J. Levitt
Adam J. Levitt
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.

7

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

5

DATED: January 13, 2016

8
9

By:

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

DATED: January __, 2016
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - 3
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC