Whalen v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 253

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #252 Modification to Deadline to File Responsive Declaration Regarding Motion to Seal Reply in Support of Class Certification Brief filed by Ford Motor Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/9/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) redwards@omm.com E. CLAY MARQUEZ (S.B. # 268424) cmarquez@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. #126539) banderson@omm.com SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) shammack@omm.com DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) ddorey@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 In re: Case No. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 19 MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION TO DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE DECLARATION REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEF 20 21 22 23 24 [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE DECLARATION NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their thirty-five page reply in support of their motion for class certification on Monday, May 2, 2016, along with exhibits; 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs cited numerous documents in those papers that have been 4 designated by Ford as Protected Documents pursuant to the protective order entered in this case 5 (ECF No. 96), and made numerous assertions that are derived from such Protective Documents; 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Protective Order and Local Rule 79-5, Plaintiffs filed their 7 papers as partially redacted so as not to disclose the contents of the Protected Documents, and 8 filed a motion to seal the redacted information; 9 WHEREAS Ford is required to file a responsive declaration supporting the sealing of the 10 Protected Documents or information derived therefrom in Plaintiffs’ papers within four days after 11 they are filed (see ECF No. 96 at 6); 12 WHEREAS, the number of the Protected Documents Plaintiffs cited in their papers, and 13 the fact that the individual responsible for signing the declaration will be out of the office and 14 unavailable on Thursday, May 5 and Friday, May 6 make it impractical to finish the declaration 15 by Friday, May 6, despite best efforts; 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, Ford requires an extension of three business days in order to complete its responsive declaration; WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief pursuant to a stipulation by the parties; WHEREAS, the deadline extension stipulated to by Ford and Plaintiffs will require no change to the dates set for trial of the matter; WHEREAS, execution of this Stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs or Ford otherwise may have; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 1. The deadline for Ford to file a responsive declaration to establish that certain material in Plaintiffs’ class certification reply papers is sealable is extended to 28 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE DECLARATION NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 1 Wednesday, May 11, 2016. 2 3 Dated: May 4, 2016 4 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company Dated: May 4, 2016 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP By: /s/ Craig Spiegel Craig Spiegel Steve W. Berman Craig Spiegel HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: (206) 623-7292 Fax: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com Adam J. Levitt GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Tel: (312) 214-0000 Fax: (312) 214-0001 alevitt@gelaw.com Roland Tellis (186269) Mark Pifko (228412) BARON & BUDD, P.C. 15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 Encino, California 91436 Tel: (818) 839-2320 Fax: (818) 986-9698 rtellis@baronbudd.com mpifko@baronbudd.com Nicholas E. Chimicles (pro hac vice) Benjamin F. Johns (pro hac vice) CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE DECLARATION NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 1 One Haverford Centre 361 West Lancaster Avenue Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 Tel: (610) 642-8500 Fax: (610) 649-3633 JGS@chimicles.com MDS@chimicles.com 2 3 4 5 Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 6 7 8 9 10 11 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 12 13 14 Dated: May 4, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 15 16 17 By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards Attorney for Defendant Ford Motor Company 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE DECLARATION NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 S The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge DERED O OR IT IS S 7 LI ER n M. Che A H 10 RT 9 NO 8 dward Judge E R NIA 6 , 2016 UNIT ED 5 9 DATED: May __ RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 2 ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE DECLARATION NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?