Whalen v. Ford Motor Company
Filing
266
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part #256 Motion for Leave to File; granting #263 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
In re:
Case No. 13-cv-03072-EMC
8
MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER
9
LITIGATION
10
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
SURREPLY, AND RESCHEDULING
HEARING
11
Docket Nos. 256, 263
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
On May 12, 2016, Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) sought leave to file a
13
surreply. Docket No. 256 (“Request”). Ford also objected to Plaintiffs’ reply brief. Docket No.
14
258 (“Objections”). Plaintiffs opposed Ford’s Request in part, but consented to a five-page
15
surreply responding to Plaintiffs’ efforts to exclude Ford’s expert, Dr. Wood. Docket No. 264.1
16
Having reviewed the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS Ford’s Request to file a five-
17
page surreply responding to Plaintiffs’ request to exclude Dr. Wood’s report. The Court otherwise
18
DENIES Ford’s Request. The Court does not yet rule on Ford’s Objections. Ford shall file its
19
surreply as to Dr. Wood’s report by May 20, 2016.
The Court reschedules the hearing on the motion for class certification, originally
20
21
scheduled for May 26, to June 6, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 256 and 263.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: May 18, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
25
26
27
1
28
The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ accompanying Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.
Docket No. 263.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?