Whalen v. Ford Motor Company
Filing
66
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #65 TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Jennifer Whalen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/14/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
Steve W. Berman, (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Jeff D. Friedman (CSB No. 173886)
Shana E. Scarlett (CSB No. 217895)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
jefff@hbsslaw.com
shanas@hbsslaw.com
Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel
12
13
[Additional Counsel listed on Signature Page]
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER
LITIGATION
No. 13-cv-3072-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN
OPPOSITION TO FORD MOTOR
COMPANY’S MEMORANDUM OF
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO
DISMISS
20
21
22
23
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11]
24
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
25
26
27
28
010388-11 672067 V1
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) in the
3
4
above-titled action in this Court and served it on Defendant Ford Motor Company on November 12,
5
2013;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, the Complaint includes 24 plaintiffs from 15 states collectively stating over 80
causes of action;
WHEREAS, Ford filed its motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) on January 13, 2014;
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2014, the parties stipulated to an extension of 50 pages for
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(a) provides that any opposition brief or memorandum may not
exceed 25 pages of text;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, this Court granted the stipulation to an extension of 50
pages for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief,
including permission “to exceed otherwise applicable page limitations,” pursuant to a stipulation by
the parties;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs anticipate they will need 50 pages to adequately present their response
in opposition to Ford’s Motion to Dismiss in light of the number of pages extended to Defendant;
WHEREAS, Ford has stipulated that it will not oppose a request by Plaintiffs to extend the
page limit for the brief in support of their opposition to a comparable number of pages;
24
25
26
WHEREAS, execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs
or Defendant may otherwise have;
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 1
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC
010388-11 672067 V1
1
2
3
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel
of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiffs shall have leave to file a response in
opposition of no more than 50 pages to Ford’s motion to dismiss.
4
5
DATED: February 13, 2014
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
6
By
7
8
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
9
10
11
12
13
Jeff D. Friedman (CSB No. 173886)
Shana E. Scarlett (CSB No. 217895)
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
jefff@hbsslaw.com
shanas@hbsslaw.com
14
15
16
17
18
Adam J. Levitt (pro hac vice)
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200
Chicago, IL 60602
Telephone: (312) 214-0000
Facsimile: (312) 214-0001
alevitt@gelaw.com
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Steve W. Berman
STEVE W. BERMAN
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 2
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC
010388-11 672067 V1
Roland Tellis (186269)
Mark Pifko (228412)
BARON & BUDD, P.C.
15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600
Encino, CA 91436
Telephone: (818) 839-2320
Facsimile: (818) 986-9698
rtellis@baronbudd.com
mpifko@baronbudd.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice)
Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice)
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
One Haverford Centre
361 West Lancaster Avenue
Haverford, PA 19041
Telephone: (610) 642-8500
Facsimile: (610) 649-3633
JGS@chimicles.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel
13
14
DATED: February 13, 2014
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
15
16
By
/s/ Randall W. Edwards
RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053)
KEVIN R. RUBINO (S.B. #255677)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
krubino@omm.com
redwards@omm.com
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 3
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC
010388-11 672067 V1
BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. # 126539)
banderson@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006-4001
Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300
Facsimile: (202) 383-5414
1
2
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 4
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC
010388-11 672067 V1
1
2
3
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing.
4
5
DATED: February 13, 2014
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
6
By
7
/s/ Steve W. Berman
STEVE W. BERMAN
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
S
DATED: February __, 2014
RT
17
ER
H
18
N
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE
IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 5
Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC
010388-11 672067 V1
n
M. Che
FO
dward
Judge E
NO
16
LI
15
TED
GRAN
R NIA
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
14
28
RT
U
O
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
_________________________________________
TA
14
UNIT
ED
12
A
10
ORDER
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?