Whalen v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 66

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #65 TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Jennifer Whalen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/14/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Steve W. Berman, (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jeff D. Friedman (CSB No. 173886) Shana E. Scarlett (CSB No. 217895) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 jefff@hbsslaw.com shanas@hbsslaw.com Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 12 13 [Additional Counsel listed on Signature Page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION No. 13-cv-3072-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS 20 21 22 23 [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] 24 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 25 26 27 28 010388-11 672067 V1 1 STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) in the 3 4 above-titled action in this Court and served it on Defendant Ford Motor Company on November 12, 5 2013; 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the Complaint includes 24 plaintiffs from 15 states collectively stating over 80 causes of action; WHEREAS, Ford filed its motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) on January 13, 2014; WHEREAS, on January 10, 2014, the parties stipulated to an extension of 50 pages for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(a) provides that any opposition brief or memorandum may not exceed 25 pages of text; WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, this Court granted the stipulation to an extension of 50 pages for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief, including permission “to exceed otherwise applicable page limitations,” pursuant to a stipulation by the parties; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs anticipate they will need 50 pages to adequately present their response in opposition to Ford’s Motion to Dismiss in light of the number of pages extended to Defendant; WHEREAS, Ford has stipulated that it will not oppose a request by Plaintiffs to extend the page limit for the brief in support of their opposition to a comparable number of pages; 24 25 26 WHEREAS, execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs or Defendant may otherwise have; 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC 010388-11 672067 V1 1 2 3 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiffs shall have leave to file a response in opposition of no more than 50 pages to Ford’s motion to dismiss. 4 5 DATED: February 13, 2014 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 6 By 7 8 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com 9 10 11 12 13 Jeff D. Friedman (CSB No. 173886) Shana E. Scarlett (CSB No. 217895) 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 jefff@hbsslaw.com shanas@hbsslaw.com 14 15 16 17 18 Adam J. Levitt (pro hac vice) GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 214-0000 Facsimile: (312) 214-0001 alevitt@gelaw.com 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Steve W. Berman STEVE W. BERMAN STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 2 Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC 010388-11 672067 V1 Roland Tellis (186269) Mark Pifko (228412) BARON & BUDD, P.C. 15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 Encino, CA 91436 Telephone: (818) 839-2320 Facsimile: (818) 986-9698 rtellis@baronbudd.com mpifko@baronbudd.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice) Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice) CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP One Haverford Centre 361 West Lancaster Avenue Haverford, PA 19041 Telephone: (610) 642-8500 Facsimile: (610) 649-3633 JGS@chimicles.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 13 14 DATED: February 13, 2014 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 15 16 By /s/ Randall W. Edwards RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) KEVIN R. RUBINO (S.B. #255677) O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 krubino@omm.com redwards@omm.com 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 3 Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC 010388-11 672067 V1 BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. # 126539) banderson@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 1 2 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 4 Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC 010388-11 672067 V1 1 2 3 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 4 5 DATED: February 13, 2014 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 6 By 7 /s/ Steve W. Berman STEVE W. BERMAN 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 S DATED: February __, 2014 RT 17 ER H 18 N 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS - 5 Case No.: 13-cv-3072-EMC 010388-11 672067 V1 n M. Che FO dward Judge E NO 16 LI 15 TED GRAN R NIA The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge 14 28 RT U O 13 S DISTRICT TE C _________________________________________ TA 14 UNIT ED 12 A 10 ORDER D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?