Heatherly et al v. Buffalo Exchange Ltd. et al
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. The court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute it. Plaintiffs SHALL do so by filing a written response no later than 5:00 p.m. Thursday, De cember 19, 2013. If Plaintiff does not file a response by the deadline, Plaintiff is warned that the court may dismiss the action without prejudice. If the action has settled, Plaintiffs and Defendants should file a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2013. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/18/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
Northern District of California
6
San Francisco Division
7
DAREN HEATHERLY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
No. C 13-03081 LB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
9
BUFFALO EXCHANGE LTD., et al.,
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
On July 3, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendants Buffalo Exchange Ltd. and
13
Roberta Lince for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Complaint, ECF No. 1.
14
Defendants were served, and they answered the complaint on August 22, 2013. Answer, ECF No. 7.
15
Since then, it appears from the docket that nothing has happened. See generally Docket.
16
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order issued on July 3, 2013, October 16, 2013 was the last day for the
17
parties to hold a joint inspection of the subject premises. ADR Scheduling Order, ECF No. 2. The
18
court does not know if this happened. 42 days after the joint inspection, the parties were to file a
19
Notice of Need for Mediation. Id. They have not done so.
20
Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause why this action should not be
21
dismissed for failure to prosecute it. Plaintiffs SHALL do so by filing a written response no later
22
than 5:00 p.m. Thursday, December 19, 2013. If Plaintiff does not file a response by the deadline,
23
Plaintiff is warned that the court may dismiss the action without prejudice. If the action has settled,
24
Plaintiffs and Defendants should file a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
25
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
26
27
28
C 13-03081 LB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: December 18, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 13-03081 LB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?