Kalincheva v. Neubarth

Filing 26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IFP; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FREE ACCESS AND EXEMPTION FROM PACER USER FEES 24 25 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/21/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MAGDALINA KALINCHEVA, M.D., 9 Plaintiff, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IFP AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FREE ACCESS AND EXEMPTION FROM PACER USER FEES JESSE NEUBARTH, 12 No. C 13-3212-SI No. C 13-3294-SI No. C 14-3323-SI Defendant. / 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Presently before the Court are two motions by plaintiff Magdalina Kalincheva, proceeding pro se, to proceed in forma pauperis and for free access and exemption from PACER user fees in all districts for the next twenty-four years. The motions state that they are being filed in Case Nos. 13-cv-3212, 13cv-3294, and 14-cv-3323.1 On July 11, 2013, plaintiff filed an action in the Northern District of California against defendant Jesse Neubarth. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 13-cv- 3212, Docket No. 1 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2013). This Court transferred the action to the Eastern District of California. Id., Docket No. 14. In the order, the Court noted that both plaintiff and defendant reside in the Eastern District, and no defendant is alleged to reside in, and none of the events or omissions giving rise to the complaint occurred in, the Northern District. Id. On February 21, 2014, the district court in the Eastern District of California dismissed the action and entered judgment against plaintiff. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 2:13-cv-1601, Docket Nos. 17, 18 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2014). On July 15, 2014, plaintiff filed a second action in the Northern District of California against 28 1 The motions also state that they are being filed in Case No. 14-cv-2705. That case was before Judge Hamilton. On August 7, 2014, Judge Hamilton transferred the action to the Eastern District of California. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 14-cv-2705, Docket No. 24 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2014). 1 defendant Jesse Neubarth. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 13-cv-3294, Docket No. 1 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2 2013). This Court also transferred the second action to the Eastern District of California. Id., Docket 3 No. 13. On September 16, 2013, the district court in the Eastern District of California dismissed the 4 action and entered judgment against plaintiff. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 2:13-cv-1676, Docket Nos. 5 17-18 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2013). 6 On July 23, 2014, plaintiff filed a fourth action2 in the Northern District of California against 7 defendant Jesse Neubarth. Kalincheva v. Neubarth, No. 14-cv-3323, Docket No. 1 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 8 2014). This Court also transferred the third action to the Eastern District of California. Id., Docket No. 9 9. That action is now pending in the Eastern District of California. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Because Case Nos. 13-cv-3212, 13-cv-3294, and 14-cv-3323 have been transferred to the 11 Eastern District of California and are no longer presently before this Court, the Court DENIES 12 plaintiff’s two motions without prejudice to plaintiff refiling the motions in her pending action in the 13 Eastern District of California. This Order resolves Docket Nos. 24 and 25 in Case No. 13-cv-3212 and 14 Docket Nos. 27 and 28 in Case No. 13-cv-3294. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: August 21, 2014 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 The third action was Case No. 14-cv-2705 before Judge Hamilton. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?