Mc Erlain v. Park Plaza Towers Owners Association et al

Filing 81

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. To the extent the motion seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the August 12, 2014 order, the motion is granted, and plaintiff is directed to file his motion for reconsideration no later than September 19, 2014. To the extent the motion seeks an order certifying the August 12, 2014 order as appropriate for interlocutory appeal, the motion is denied as premature. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 9, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PATRICK JOHN MCERLAIN, No. C-13-3232 MMC For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF v. PARK PLAZA TOWERS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration 16 of August 12, 2014 Order Granting Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,” filed September 17 4, 2014. Having read and considered the motion, the Court rules as follows. 18 Good cause appearing, to the extent the motion seeks leave to file a motion for 19 reconsideration of the August 12, 2014 order, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and plaintiff 20 is hereby DIRECTED to file his motion for reconsideration no later than September 19, 21 2014. 22 In light of the above, to the extent the motion seeks, in the alternative, an order 23 certifying the August 12, 2014 order as appropriate for interlocutory appeal, the motion is 24 hereby DENIED as premature. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: September 9, 2014 28 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?