Mc Erlain v. Park Plaza Towers Owners Association et al
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. To the extent the motion seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the August 12, 2014 order, the motion is granted, and plaintiff is directed to file his motion for reconsideration no later than September 19, 2014. To the extent the motion seeks an order certifying the August 12, 2014 order as appropriate for interlocutory appeal, the motion is denied as premature. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 9, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PATRICK JOHN MCERLAIN,
No. C-13-3232 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION; DIRECTIONS
TO PLAINTIFF
v.
PARK PLAZA TOWERS OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration
16
of August 12, 2014 Order Granting Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,” filed September
17
4, 2014. Having read and considered the motion, the Court rules as follows.
18
Good cause appearing, to the extent the motion seeks leave to file a motion for
19
reconsideration of the August 12, 2014 order, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and plaintiff
20
is hereby DIRECTED to file his motion for reconsideration no later than September 19,
21
2014.
22
In light of the above, to the extent the motion seeks, in the alternative, an order
23
certifying the August 12, 2014 order as appropriate for interlocutory appeal, the motion is
24
hereby DENIED as premature.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: September 9, 2014
28
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?