Cronk v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURTS STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
JAVELLE CRONK,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
RECKITT BENCKISER
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant.
/
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
15
17
No. C 13-3245 MMC
On July 30, 2013, plaintiff electronically filed a Memorandum in Opposition to
defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and
the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of
each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 51(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.
Chesney ¶ 2.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: August 6, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?