Cronk v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANELLE CRONK,
CASE NO. CI3-03245 MMC
Plaintiff(s),
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
RECKITT BENCKISER
PHARMACEUTICALS, lNC.,
Defendant(s).
------------------------~/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
0
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
0
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
0
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ojADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeed for
ADR Phone Conforence. See CiVil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
!ZI Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The Hon. Jamie JacobsMay of JAMS
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
0
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
IZI
other requested deadline: March 31, 2014
Dated: 11122/2013
Dated: 11/22/20 13
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
☐
☐
Dated:
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 26, 2013
__________________________________
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?