Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. et al v. Celera Corporporation et al
Filing
31
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO SET MODIFIED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/7/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND, L.P.,
BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND II,
L.P., INVESTMENT 10, L.L.C., BVF
INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., BVF INC., and
BVF X, LLC,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
18
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND TO SET MODIFIED
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
CELERA CORPORATION, QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED,
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA)
LLC, KATHY ORDONEZ, RICHARD H.
AYERS, JEAN-LUC BELINGARD,
WILLIAM G. GREEN, PETER BARTON
HUTT, GAIL M. NAUGHTON, WAYNE
I. ROE, and BENNET M. SHAPIRO,
19
No. C 13-03248 WHA
Defendants.
15
16
17
/
20
21
The parties stipulated to an extension of time for defendants to respond to the amended
22
complaint (Dkt. No. 27). Under Local Rule 6-1(a), this is permissible without a court order. The
23
parties, however, further agreed to a modified briefing schedule for defendants’ motions to
24
dismiss. Although the briefing schedule departs significantly from the normal 35-day track, the
25
parties have not provided adequate justification for such departure. Accordingly, this briefing
26
schedule is DENIED. Defendants will file the motions to dismiss on a normal 35-day track.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?