Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. et al v. Celera Corporporation et al

Filing 86

NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/11/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND, L.P., BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND II, L.P., INVESTMENT 10, L.L.C., BVF INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.; BVF INC., and BVF X, LLC, 13 14 15 No. C 13-03248 WHA NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT Plaintiffs, v. 19 CELERA CORPORATION, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED, CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, KATHY ORDOÑEZ, RICHARD H. AYERS, JEAN-LUC BELINGARD, WILLIAM G. GREEN, PETER BARTON HUTT, GAIL M. NAUGHTON, WAYNE I. ROE, and BENNETT M. SHAPIRO, 20 Defendants. 16 17 18 / 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has noticed that the amended complaint contains the following allegation (Amd. Compl. ¶ 111): First, the clear disparity between Credit Suisse’s prior probability adjustments, which it presented to the Celera Board as recently as February 3, 2011, and the substantially lower probability adjustments underlying the erroneous analysis that were derived from the same Tufts Study — which Credit Suisse presented to the Board just over one month later, during its meetings of March 7 and 17, 2011 — either did alert, or should have alerted, the Individual Defendants to Credit Suisse’s stark errors. This allegation does not appear in plaintiffs’ briefs in opposing defendants’ two motions to dismiss. For tomorrow’s hearing, counsel for both sides should be prepared to clarify whether 1 this allegation remains operative or not. If possible, the Court would also like to see the “prior 2 probability adjustments” that were presented to Celera’s board of directors on February 3, 2011. 3 4 Dated: December 11, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?