A.C. v. City of Santa Clara et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Mediation Deadline filed by A.C. Case Management Statement due by 5/29/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/5/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/3/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)

1 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., (SBN 69888)
DeWITT M. LACY, Esq., (SBN 258789)
2 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
3 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 A.C.
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

A. C., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Case No.: C13-3276 EMC
12 Litem, MARK CALHOUN,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT
13
Plaintiff,
CONFERENCE DEADLINE
14
v.
Date:
February 24, 2014
Courtroom: 5-17th Floor
15 CITY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,
Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE

1
2
3
4
5

Plaintiff A.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, MARK CALHOUN and
Defendants CITY OF SANTA CLARA, et. al. by and through their respective counsel of record,
hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

March 20, 2014 for the following actions:

6

A.C. v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, et. al.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

The deadline to conduct a Mandatory Settlement Conference is presently set as

(C13-3276 EMC)
2.

Because the current deadline would not allow enough time for Plaintiff to conduct

discovery necessary to participate meaningfully in settlement discussions, the parties have agreed
to an extension of the deadline for 60 days. Plaintiff has discussed the extension of time to
conduct the Mandatory Settlement Conference with United States Magistrate Judge Nathaniel
Cousins. Judge Cousins did not indicate opposition to such a stipulation between the parties.
Accordingly, the undersigned stipulate and agree to an extension of the deadline to conduct a
Mandatory Settlement Conference currently set as March 20, 2014 to May 20, 2014 or, to a
future date mutually convenient to both parties and the Court.

16
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

18
19
DATED: February 24, 2014

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP

20
21
By: /s/ ______________________
Rebecca Widen
Attorney for Defendants

22
23
24
25 DATED: February 24, 2014

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

26

By: /s/ DeWitt M. Lacy
DEWITT M. LACY
Attorneys for Plaintiff

27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER

5
6
7
8
9
10

This matter comes before the Court upon both parties’ Stipulation to extend the deadline
to conduct a Mandatory Settlement Conference. Upon careful scrutiny, and for good cause
shown, the Court finds the stipulation well taken and grants the request to extend the deadline to
conduct the Mandatory Settlement Conference.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

11
12
1.

The deadline to conduct a Mandatory Settlement Conference, originally set for

13
March 20, 2014, shall be extended to May 20, 2014.
14
.2. Further CMC is reset to 6/5/2014 at 10:30 a.m.
joint CMC statement shall be filed by 5/29/14.

16

23

S

ER

R NIA

FO

dwa
Judge E

H

22

RT

21

hen

rd M. C

NO

20

March 3, 2014

D
RDERE
S SO O U.S. D
HONORABLE IFIEDISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IT I
D
EDWARD M. CHEN
AS MO

LI

19

DATED: February___, 2014

UNIT
ED

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

17

An updated

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

15

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC