A.C. v. City of Santa Clara et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Frank Hagg, Josh Higgins, City of Santa Clara, Nathan Crescini, Mike Horn, Troy Cardin Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/5/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Rebecca S. Widen, SBN 219207
HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: 510-763-2324
Fax: 510-273-8534
E-mail: rwiden@htalaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, MIKE HORN,
NATHAN CRESCINI, JOSH HIGGINS,
FRANK HAGG, and TROY CARDIN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
10
Attorneys At Law
Park Plaza Building
1939 Harrison St., Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: 510-763-2324
Facsimile: 510-273-8534
Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
A. C., a minor, by and through his Guardian
Ad Litem, MARK CALHOUN,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a municipal
)
corporation; MIKE HORN, individually and in )
his official capacities as a police officer for the )
CITY OF SANTA CLARA Police Department; )
NATHAN CRESCINI, individually and in his )
official capacities as a police officer for the
)
CITY OF SANTA CLARA Police Department; )
JOSH HIGGINS, individually and in his official )
capacities as a police officer for the CITY OF )
SANTA CLARA Police Department; FRANK )
HAGG, individually and in his official capacities )
as a police officer for the CITY OF SANTA
)
CLARA Police Department; TROY CARDIN; )
individually and in his official capacities as a
)
police officer for the CITY OF SANTA CLARA )
Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
Case No.: C13-3276 EMC (NC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
23
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, through their
25
attorneys of record, that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled on
26
June 12, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. be continued. The Case Management Conference date was
27
originally set so that it occurred after the parties’ scheduled Mandatory Settlement Conference
28
on May 20, 2014. However, the parties’ Mandatory Settlement Conference was continued to
1
A. C., a minor, v. City of Santa Clara, et al.,/Case #C13-3276 EMC (NC)
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Conference
1
August 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., and the parties agree that the Case Management Conference date
2
should be moved accordingly, to take place after August 8, 2014.
3
Dated: June 4, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
4
By:
5
6
7
8
Dated: June 4, 2014
*/s/ DeWitt M. Lacy
DeWitt M. Lacy
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*Mr. Lacy provided his consent that this
document be electronically filed
HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP
9
By:
10
ORDER
12
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for
13
14
June 12, 2014 be continued so that it takes place after the parties’ August 8, 2014 Mandatory
15
Settlement Conference. The new date and time for the parties’ Case Management Conference is
16
_________________________.
17
Dated:
August 28, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall
be filed by August 21, 2014.
6/5/14
25
ER
R NIA
dward
Judge E
H
24
RT
23
NO
22
n
M. Che
FO
21
O
IT IS S
DIFIED
AS MO
LI
20
Judge Edward M. Chen
E
U.S. District D
ORDER Court Judge
A
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
18
UNIT
ED
Attorneys At Law
Park Plaza Building
1939 Harrison St., Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: 510-763-2324
Facsimile: 510-273-8534
Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP
11
/s/ Rebecca S. Widen
Rebecca S. Widen
Attorneys for Defendants
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
2
A. C., a minor, v. City of Santa Clara, et al.,/Case #C13-3276 EMC (NC)
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Conference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?