A.C. v. City of Santa Clara et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Frank Hagg, Josh Higgins, City of Santa Clara, Nathan Crescini, Mike Horn, Troy Cardin Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/5/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Rebecca S. Widen, SBN 219207 HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: 510-763-2324 Fax: 510-273-8534 E-mail: rwiden@htalaw.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SANTA CLARA, MIKE HORN, NATHAN CRESCINI, JOSH HIGGINS, FRANK HAGG, and TROY CARDIN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 10 Attorneys At Law Park Plaza Building 1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-763-2324 Facsimile: 510-273-8534 Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A. C., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, MARK CALHOUN, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a municipal ) corporation; MIKE HORN, individually and in ) his official capacities as a police officer for the ) CITY OF SANTA CLARA Police Department; ) NATHAN CRESCINI, individually and in his ) official capacities as a police officer for the ) CITY OF SANTA CLARA Police Department; ) JOSH HIGGINS, individually and in his official ) capacities as a police officer for the CITY OF ) SANTA CLARA Police Department; FRANK ) HAGG, individually and in his official capacities ) as a police officer for the CITY OF SANTA ) CLARA Police Department; TROY CARDIN; ) individually and in his official capacities as a ) police officer for the CITY OF SANTA CLARA ) Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No.: C13-3276 EMC (NC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, through their 25 attorneys of record, that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled on 26 June 12, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. be continued. The Case Management Conference date was 27 originally set so that it occurred after the parties’ scheduled Mandatory Settlement Conference 28 on May 20, 2014. However, the parties’ Mandatory Settlement Conference was continued to 1 A. C., a minor, v. City of Santa Clara, et al.,/Case #C13-3276 EMC (NC) Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Conference 1 August 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., and the parties agree that the Case Management Conference date 2 should be moved accordingly, to take place after August 8, 2014. 3 Dated: June 4, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 4 By: 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 4, 2014 */s/ DeWitt M. Lacy DeWitt M. Lacy Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Mr. Lacy provided his consent that this document be electronically filed HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 9 By: 10 ORDER 12 IT IS SO ORDERED that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for 13 14 June 12, 2014 be continued so that it takes place after the parties’ August 8, 2014 Mandatory 15 Settlement Conference. The new date and time for the parties’ Case Management Conference is 16 _________________________. 17 Dated: August 28, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed by August 21, 2014. 6/5/14 25 ER R NIA dward Judge E H 24 RT 23 NO 22 n M. Che FO 21 O IT IS S DIFIED AS MO LI 20 Judge Edward M. Chen E U.S. District D ORDER Court Judge A 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 18 UNIT ED Attorneys At Law Park Plaza Building 1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-763-2324 Facsimile: 510-273-8534 Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP 11 /s/ Rebecca S. Widen Rebecca S. Widen Attorneys for Defendants N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 2 A. C., a minor, v. City of Santa Clara, et al.,/Case #C13-3276 EMC (NC) Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?