Toppan Photomasks, Inc. v. Park

Filing 36

ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PARTIES' 35 DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 12, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)

Toppan Photomasks, Inc. v. Park

Doc. 36

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

TAPPAN PHOTO MASKS, INC,

No. C 13-3323 MMC

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE PARTIES’ DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v.
13
KEUN TAEK PARK,
14

Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

/

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, the parties’ discovery dispute, as described in
their Joint Discovery Letter Brief, filed August 12, 2103, and all further discovery matters,
are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the
convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties as to
how that Magistrate Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling,
order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. The parties will be
advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance, if any, by notice from the
assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 12, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

28

Dockets.Justia.com