United States of America v. Ismail
Filing
7
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2013. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/27/2013 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 08/07/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
SELLAM ISMAIL,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
_____________________________________ )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
18
No. CV 13-3339 SC
[Proposed]
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT
BE ENFORCED
Upon consideration of the United States’ Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue
19
Summons and the Declaration in support thereof, the Court finds that the United States
20
has established a prima facie case under United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964) for
21
enforcement of the Internal Revenue Service summons at issue.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Sellam Ismail, appear
23
before the undersigned United States District Judge, on the 27th day of September 2013,
24
at 10 a.m., in Courtroom No. 1, 17th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate
25
Avenue, San Francisco, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why
26
Respondent should not be compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as
27
required by the summons.
28
//
1
It is further ORDERED that:
2
1. A copy of this Order, together with the Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue
3
Service Summons and supporting papers, shall be served upon Respondent in accordance
4
with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five days before the
5
date set for the show-cause hearing;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2. Since the Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Summons and supporting papers
make a prima facie showing that the IRS investigation is being conducted for a legitimate
purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the information sought is
not already within the Commissioner’s possession, and that the administrative steps
required by the Internal Revenue Code have been followed, see United States v. Powell,
379 U.S. 48 (1964), the burden has shifted to Respondent to oppose enforcement of the
summons;
3. If Respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the Petition, such
15
defense or opposition shall be made in writing, filed with the Clerk and served on counsel
16
for the United States, at least 21 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing.
17
The United States may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least 14 days prior
18
to the date set for the show-cause hearing.
19
4. At the show-cause hearing, the Court will consider all issues raised by Respondent.
20
Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by
21
an affidavit or declaration will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the Petition
22
will be considered admitted.
ORDERED this
07
day of August
, 2013, at San Francisco, California.
24
S
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
26
NO
LI
ER
H
United States v. Sellam Ismail
No. CV 13-3339 SC
[Proposed] Order
onti
amuel C
Judge S
RT
28
2
FO
27
R NIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?